Reporting in Randomized Trials Published in International Journal of Cardiology in 2011 Compared to the Recommendations Made in CONSORT 2010

Hong-Lin Chen,Kun Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.06.045
IF: 4.039
2012-01-01
International Journal of Cardiology
Abstract:Since its modest beginning in 1981, the International Journal of Cardiology (IJC) has progressed to become one of the most-recognized journals in the field of cardiology. The 2010 impact factor in the Science Citation Index (SCI) is 6.802, which has risen 6-fold in the last decade. The journal aims to present all aspects of cardiovascular medicine of relevance to the clinician from genes to populations. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the standard method for the evaluation of treatments and technologies in clinical medicine. It has published many RCTs in the IJC. Inadequate trial design and inadequate reporting for RCTs are associated with biased estimates of effect, and incomplete descriptions of important methodological details in RCT publications make it difficult to assess the quality of the design, conduct, and analysis of the trial and limit readers' ability to interpret the results. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement provides a standardized framework to help authors prepare reports of their trial findings in a complete and transparent manner. The aim of this study was to assess quality of reporting of trial methodology and outcomes in RCTs published in IJC based on the CONSORT Statement, and find where improvements were required for this journal.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?