Research on Returns on Education at All Levels and Changes for Urban Residents in China 2002-2009

Ding Xiaohao,Yu Hongxia,Yu Qiumei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697291-9
2017-01-01
Abstract:Since China launched the Reform and Opening-Up Policy, the distribution of educational opportunities and the distribution of income have changed immensely. The empirical study of the relationship between education and income, especially the evolution of this relationship, has important theoretical and practical value when it comes to understanding the role of education in the economy and improving education, employment, and income distribution policies. Recent research by Ding et al. (2012) estimated the returns on educationfor the period from 2002 to 2009 and how they changed over time using the urban household survey data provided by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). The research results showed that in recent years returns on education did not maintain sustained accelerated growth as was experienced during the period from the late 1980s to the first five years of the twenty-first century, but rather gradually flattened out. After taking variables such as industry, employer type, and geographic region into account, returns on education show a slight decline. Until now, research reports have rarely been able to identify time change trends in returns on education in China. Since this research used years of education as a proxy variable, the estimated coefficient obtained therefrom actually indicated the average annual returns on education at all levels. However, education at different levels likely had distinct returns. It is difficult to identify structural differences between returns on education at different levels if the research does not distinguish between the levels. Recognizing the structural differences is significant when it comes to deciding whether the investment in educational resources is reasonable, whether the scale of education is proper, and why a certain group of students do or do not continue receiving education. Based on the above-mentioned survey data, this chapter analyzes the returns on education at all levels (i.e. distinguishing between the levels) and their development trends between 2002 and 2009.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?