Abstract 1122‐000167: Hyperintense Acute Reperfusion Marker and Hemorrhagic Conversion in Stroke Patients Undergoing Mechanical Reperfusion
Pouria Moshayedi,Hamidreza Saber,David S Liebeskind,Jeffrey Gornbein,Bryan Yoo,Latisha Sharma,Mersedeh Bahr Hosseini,Reza Jahan,Gary Duckwiler,Satoshi Tateshima,May Nour,Victor Szeder,Geoffrey Colby,Jeffrey L Saver,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.01.suppl_1.000167
2021-11-01
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Abstract:Introduction : Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a highly effective treatment to improve clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS‐LVO). However, blood‐brain barrier (BBB) disruption causing hemorrhagic transformation and reperfusion injury can potentially negate the beneficial effect of reperfusion. Studying determinants, frequency, and outcomes of the hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) sign, a biomarker of BBB disruption, would help to identify individual patients at increased risk, as well as developing therapies to prevent BBB breakdown. Methods : In consecutive AIS‐LVO patients with AIS‐LVO who underwent EVT followed by MRI within the next 24 hours, we evaluated frequency, determinants, and outcomes of HARM sign. Results : Among 81 patients meeting study criteria, age was 71.0 (SD 19.7), 58% female, mean NIHSS was 14.5 (SD 6.8), and time from last known well to treatment was 355 min (IQR 206.5 ‐ 664). HARM sign was observed in 64% (52/81) of patients. On multivariate logistic analysis, presence of HARM sign was independently associated with greater periventricular white matter hyperintensity, higher pre‐EVT ischemic core volume, more proximal target vessel occlusion, and achievement of successful reperfusion or better. Hemorrhagic conversion was seen in 31.8% of patients with HARM sign and 26.7% of patients without HARM sign. Multivariate analysis identified higher blood glucose, lower ASPECT, score and greater post‐EVT ischemic core volume as independent predictors of hemorrhagic conversion. HARM sign was identified to correlate with poor clinical outcome in bivariate analysis, but multivariate analysis only identified less neurological deficits, lower baseline systolic BP, lower degree of periventricular white matter hyperintensities, shorter time to device deployment and reduced post EVT ischemic core volume as independent predictors of good clinical outcome (mRS 0–2) upon discharge. Conclusions : The HARM sign indicating disruption of the blood‐brain barrier following EVT is common, present in about 6 of every 10 treated patients. Independent risk factors for HARM sign are chronic ischemic microangiopathy, greater acute ischemic core, and successful reperfusion. HARM sign presence is associated with worse functional outcome.