Abstract:Models based on sparse graphs are of interest to many communities: they appear as basic models in combinatorics, probability theory, optimization, statistical physics, information theory, and more applied fields of social sciences and economics. Different notions of similarity (and hence convergence) of sparse graphs are of interest in different communities. In probability theory and combinatorics, the notion of Benjamini‐Schramm convergence, also known as left‐convergence, is used quite frequently. Statistical physicists are interested in the the existence of the thermodynamic limit of free energies, which leads naturally to the notion of right‐convergence. Combinatorial optimization problems naturally lead to so‐called partition convergence, which relates to the convergence of optimal values of a variety of constraint satisfaction problems. The relationship between these different notions of similarity and convergence is, however, poorly understood. In this paper we introduce a new notion of convergence of sparse graphs, which we call Large Deviations or LD‐convergence, and which is based on the theory of large deviations. The notion is introduced by “decorating” the nodes of the graph with random uniform i.i.d. weights and constructing corresponding random measures on and . A graph sequence is defined to be converging if the corresponding sequence of random measures satisfies the Large Deviations Principle with respect to the topology of weak convergence on bounded measures on . The corresponding large deviations rate function can be interpreted as the limit object of the sparse graph sequence. In particular, we can express the limiting free energies in terms of this limit object. We then establish that LD‐convergence implies the other three notions of convergence discussed above, and at the same time establish several previously unknown relationships between the other notions of convergence. In particular, we show that partition‐convergence does not imply left‐ or right‐convergence, and that right‐convergence does not imply partition‐convergence. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 51, 52–89, 2017

Characterizing Weak Convergence Error Of Sparse Graph Coloring Process

Local weak convergence for sparse networks of interacting processes

Local weak convergence and its applications

Uniformly Random Colourings of Sparse Graphs

Convergent sequences of sparse graphs: A large deviations approach

Phase transitions in the coloring of random graphs

Convergence Analysis of Graph Regularized Non-Negative Matrix Factorization

Equitable coloring of sparse graphs

Coloring random graphs and maximizing local diversity

Generalized Graphon Process: Convergence of Graph Frequencies in Stretched Cut Distance

Coloring locally sparse graphs

Graph colorings under global structural conditions

FINITELY DEPENDENT COLORING

Local weak limit of dynamical inhomogeneous random graphs

Effective and Efficient Dynamic Graph Coloring

Structure Properties of a Doubly-Stochastic Process on a Network

Consistency of empirical distributions of sequences of graph statistics in networks with dependent edges

Colouring random graphs: Tame colourings

Projection Consensus for Solving Linear Equations over Random Networks

Graph coloring: a novel heuristic based on trailing path—properties, perspective and applications in structured networks

On locating and neighbor-locating colorings of sparse graphs