Estimating Accuracies And Sensitivities Of Regression Models For Rice Lai Using Different Vegetation Indices Simulated With Various Satellite Sensors

L. Chen,J. F. Huang
2008-01-01
Abstract:Comparison of estimating accuracy between Regression models of vegetation indexes (VIs) for estimating LAI was made and analysis of VIs' sensitivity to changes in LAI were performed. Compared with the VIs calculated with red band reflectances, LAI shown higher linearity relationship with ratio VIs with red-edge or green band ones and higher exponential relationship with normalized VIs with green band ones.Among all of the models, the model using RED-EDGE Ratio Vegetation Index (RED-EDGE RVI) had not only the least residuals in model retrieval but also the best accuracy in external data validation. The models of Green Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (GNDVI) and Green Ratio Vegetation Index (GRVI) held the second highest position of estimating accuracies for external validation, those of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) did the third highest, and those of RVI did the last. The sensitivities of all indexes decreased with increase of LAI values, but difference of sensitivities between normalized VIs and ratio VIs was significant. The normalized VIs exhibited much higher sensitivities and decreased more rapidly than the ratio VIs at LAI values of less than 1.2, while the ratio VIs did higher sensitivities than the normalized VIs at LAI values of more than 1.2. RED-EDGE RVI and GRVI exhibited not only higher linearity relationship with LAI but also higher sensitivities at LAI values of more than 2.8. When comparison of model fitness between linear and nonlinear regression models is made, the determination coefficients of linearity relationship between the predicted and the observed should be used.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?