Anti-Cytokine And Anti-Endotoxin Therapies For Meningococcal Disease: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Li Zhou,Xiaohong Xu,Hui Yu,Chengpeng Jiang,Bin Yi,Haoyu Chen
2019-01-01
Abstract:The benefits and harms of anti-cytokine and anti-endotoxin for treating patients with meningococcal disease remain unclear. The goal of this study was to compare the effectiveness and toxicity of anti-cytokine and anti-endotoxin for meningococcal disease. This meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs reporting comparisons of toxicity of anti-cytokine and anti-endotoxin for meningococcal disease were selected for inclusion irrespective of publication status or language. Results are expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) or number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) with 95% Cl. Two trials (660 participants) met our inclusion criteria. Most of the outcomes had a moderate level of bias. There were no significant differences in mortality from meningococcal disease (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.03), NNTB 20; number of participants with any complications (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.08), NNTB 12; and long term complications (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.01), NNTB 17 between anti-endotoxin versus placebo. The evidence does not support the use of anti-endotoxin in the treatment of meningococcal disease. Outcomes from large parallel RCTs are needed to better inform clinicians regarding the use of anti-endotoxin or anti-cytokine for meningococcal disease. Patient-centered outcomes should be considered for inclusion in future studies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?