Abstract:Abstract Purpose To evaluate two three‐dimensional (3D)/3D registration platforms, one two‐dimensional (2D)/3D registration method, and one 3D surface registration method (3DS). These three technologies are available to perform six‐dimensional (6D) registrations for image‐guided radiotherapy treatment. Methods Fiducial markers were asymmetrically placed on the surfaces of an anthropomorphic head phantom (n = 13) and a body phantom (n = 8), respectively. The point match (PM) solution to the six‐dimensional (6D) transformation between the two image sets [planning computed tomography (CT) and cone beam CT (CBCT)] was determined through least‐square fitting of the fiducial positions using singular value decomposition (SVD). The transformation result from SVD was verified and was used as the gold standard to evaluate the 6D accuracy of 3D/3D registration in Varian’s platform (3D3DV), 3D/3D and 2D/3D registration in the BrainLab ExacTrac system (3D3DE and 2D3D), as well as 3DS in the AlignRT system. Image registration accuracy from each method was quantitatively evaluated by root mean square of target registration error (rmsTRE) on fiducial markers and by isocenter registration error (IRE). The Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was utilized to compare the difference of each registration method with PM. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results rmsTRE was in the range of 0.4 mm/0.7 mm (cranial/body), 0.5 mm/1 mm, 1.0 mm/1.5 mm, and 1.0 mm/1.2 mm for PM, 3D3D, 2D3D, and 3DS, respectively. Comparing to PM, the mean errors of IRE were 0.3 mm/1 mm for 3D3D, 0.5 mm/1.4 mm for 2D3D, and 1.6 mm/1.35 mm for 3DS for the cranial and body phantoms respectively. Both of 3D3D and 2D3D methods differed significantly in the roll direction as compared to the PM method for the cranial phantom. The 3DS method was significantly different from the PM method in all three translation dimensions for both the cranial (P = 0.003–P = 0.03) and body (P < 0.001–P = 0.008) phantoms. Conclusion 3D3D using CBCT had the best image registration accuracy among all the tested methods. 2D3D method was slightly inferior to the 3D3D method but was still acceptable as a treatment position verification device. 3DS is comparable to 2D3D technique and could be a substitute for X‐ray or CBCT for pretreatment verification for treatment of anatomical sites that are rigid.

3d Target Localization Using 2d Local Displacements Of Skeletal Structures In Orthogonal X-Ray Images For Image-Guided Spinal Radiosurgery

2D/3D Shape Model Registration with X-ray Images for Patient-Specific Spine Geometry Reconstruction.

2D/3D registration and motion tracking for surgical interventions

3D–2D image registration for target localization in spine surgery: investigation of similarity metrics providing robustness to content mismatch

Machine learning for automated and real-time two-dimensional to three-dimensional registration of the spine using a single radiograph

TH-C-303A-02: Clinical Data Evaluation of Fiducial-Free Spine Tracking for CyberKnife Radiosurgery

Clinical Assessment of 2D/3D Registration Accuracy in 4 Major Anatomic Sites Using On-Board 2D Kilovoltage Images for 6D Patient Setup.

Intra-fractional lung tumor motion monitoring using arbitrary gantry angles during radiotherapy treatment

A Method of 3D‐3D Multi‐stage Non‐rigid Registration of the Spine Based on Binocular Structured Light

A 3D/2D registration method based on reconstruction of orthogonal-view Xray images

Towards Non-Invasive Patient Tracking: Optical Image Analysis For Spine Tracking During Spinal Surgery Procedures

SGReg: segmentation guided 3D/2D rigid registration for orthogonal x-ray and CT images in spine surgery navigation

2D/3D registration based on biplanar X-ray and CT images for surgical navigation

Evaluation Of Three Types Of Reference Image Data For External Beam Radiotherapy Target Localization Using Digital Tomosynthesis (Dts)

A Phantom Study to Evaluate Three Different Registration Platform of 3D/3D, 2D/3D, and 3D Surface Match with 6D Alignment for Precise Image‐guided Radiotherapy

Assessment of spline-based 2D-3D registration for image-guided spine surgery.

Correction of motion-induced misalignment in co-registered PET/CT and MRI (T1/T2/FLAIR) head images for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Experimental investigation of a general real-time 3D target localization method using sequential kV imaging combined with respiratory monitoring

Automatic 2D-3D Registration without Contrast Agent during Neurovascular Interventions

Towards Optical Imaging for Spine Tracking without Markers in Navigated Spine Surgery

A Surface-Based Spatial Registration Method Based on Sense Three-Dimensional Scanner.