Dietary acid load, blood pressure, fasting blood sugar and biomarkers of insulin resistance among adults: Findings from an updated systematic review and meta‐analysis
Parvin Dehghan,Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13471
IF: 2.6
2020-01-07
International Journal of Clinical Practice
Abstract:ObjectivesThere are no clear summarized report of the association between dietary acid load components including potential renal acid load (PRAL) and net‐endogenous acid production (NEAP) with cardio‐metabolic risk factors. In the current meta‐analysis, we aimed to systematically review and summarize the eligible observational studies evaluating the association between PRAL and NEAP with blood pressure and hypertension and markers of glucose hemostasis among adults. Design and settingIn a systematic search from PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Sciences and Cochrane electronic databases up to May 2019, relevant studies were included in the literature review. Observational studies evaluating the association between PRAL and NEAP with the SBP, DBP, fasting blood glucose, insulin, HOMA‐IR, HbA1C, HOMA‐β and QUICKI and also prevalence or odds of hypertension, hyperglycemia and diabetes were included. ResultsTotal number of studies included in the 14 separate meta‐analyses were as follows: Mean (SD) of SBP (PRAL, n=12; NEAP, n=6), mean (SD) of DBP (PRAL, n=8; NEAP, n=3), mean (SD) of FBS (PRAL, n=12; NEAP, n=5), mean (SD) of HbA1C (PRAL, n=6; NEAP, n=4), mean (SD) of HOMA‐IR (PRAL, n=7), mean (SD) of insulin (PRAL, n=7; NEAP, n=2); OR of T2DM (PRAL, n =8; NEAP; n =6), HTN prevalence (PRAL, n=9; NEAP, n=9), T2DM prevalence (PRAL, n=7; NEAP, n=6). According to our results, being in the highest PRAL categories was associated with higher SBP (WMD = 0.98; CI: 0.51, 1.45; P <0.001), DBP (WMD=0.61; CI: 0.089, 1.135; P=0.022), insulin (WMD=‐0.235, CI: 0.070, 0.400; P = 0.005), higher odds of diabetes (OR= 1.19; CI: 1.092, 1.311; P <0.001), higher prevalence of T2DM (13% and 11 % in highest versus lowest category). While, being in the highest category of NEAP was only associated with higher odds of diabetes (OR=1.22; CI: 1.14, 1.31, P <0.001). In subgroup analysis for finding the possible source of heterogeneity, the continent, dietary assessment tool, sample size and gender were the potent sources of heterogeneity. No association between PRAL and NEAP with HbA1C, HOMA‐IR was reported. ConclusionsIn the current meta‐analysis, we found potent negative effects of high dietary acid load particularly higher PRAL scores cardio‐metabolic risk factors. Therefore, lower acidogenic food ingredients in the diets are suggested for prevention of cardiovascular risk factors and diabetes.
medicine, general & internal