Clinical Outcomes Of Test-Tube Versus Naturally-Conceived Twins

Jie Shi,Yunshan Zhang,Haining Luo,Ying Han,Aijun Du
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the maternal and neonatal outcomes of test-tube twins and naturally-conceived ones and to make a comparative analysis. Methods: Between January 2013 and December 2016, a total of 1200 women with twin pregnancy and a gestational age >= 28 weeks who had received regular follow-up and delivery in the Department of Obstetrics of the Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics were recruited in this study. Among them, 850 women with test-tube twins were assigned to the test-tube baby group, and 350 women with naturally-conceived twins were assigned to the natural conception group. The women in the two groups were compared in age, gestational complications, delivery modes, neonatal birth weight, birth defects and perinatal outcomes, and then statistical analyses were conducted. Results: The mean age of pregnant women in the test-tube baby group was significantly older than that of those in the natural conception group (P<0.001); the rates of pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and pregnancy-induced diabetes mellitus (PIDM) in pregnant women were considerably higher in the test-tube baby group than in the natural conception (Both P<0.05); however, the women in the two groups were generally similar in the rates of gestational complications including placenta previa, premature rupture of membranes, intrahepatic cholestasis, premature delivery, and twin transfusion syndromes, as well as birth weight, the incidence of birth defects and the morbidity of perinatal diseases in neonates (All P>0.05). Conclusion: The clinical outcomes of test-tube twins and naturally-conceived ones are basically similar, but close attention should be paid to the maternal blood pressure and glucose levels of the test-tube twins.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?