Effects of Quality Supervision and Continuous Improvement on Early Management Efficiency in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Wen Wanling,Zhang Congxin,Huang Qinghai,Yang Pengfei,Zhang Yongwei,Xing Pengfei,Li Zifu,Zhang Ping,Hong Bo,Xu Yi,Deng Benqiang,Liu Jianmin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2017.04.001
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze the effects of quality supervision and continuous improvement system on optimizing in-hospital diagnosis and treatment process in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).Methods From September 2013 to May 2016,424 consecutive patients with AIS treated with intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular therapy in Changhai Hospital,the Second Military Medical University were enrolled retrospectively.They were analyzed according to the annual running process (the first year[from September 2013 to August 2014],the second year[from September 2014 to August 2015],and the third year[from September 2015 to May 2016]).The spend time and delay (DTN>60 min,DTP>90 min) rate of each treatment process in the first,second,and third year (time from door-to-imaging[DTI],door-to-needle[DTN],imaging-to-needle (ITN),door-to-groin puncture (DTP) and imaging-to-groin puncture (ITP) were compared.Taking the time periods (>median) of having significant differences of the spend time of the treatment processes as the dependent variables in the first,second,and third year,the influence of the years and treatment modalities on delay was observed.The difference of constituent ratio of the reasons for delay in intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy (objective reasons/other reasons) in different years were analyzed.Results (1) DTIs were 23.0 (11.0,42.0) min,22.0 (10.1,39.0) min,and 13.0 (6.0,27.0) min,respectively,and DTNs were 50.0 (30.0,77.1) min,45.0 (30.0,70.2) min,and 36.0 (24.0,57.0) min,respectively in the first,second,and third year.The spending time was shortened year by year.There were significant differences among the different years (all P<0.01).The spending time of DTP had a tendency to be shortened,but there were significant differences among different years (P=0.06).There were no significant differences between the spending time of ITN and ITP (all P>0.05).(2) The DTN delay rates were 33.3% (40/120),20.7% (29/140),and 8.1% (9/111),respectively in the first,second,and third year.There were significant differences among the 3 years (x2=22.111,P<0.01).There were no significant differences among the DTP delay rates (P=0.08).(3) Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that taking the first years as a reference,the risk of DTI delay was reduced in the third year (OR,0.174,95%CI 0.101-0.298,P<0.01),the risks of DTN delay were reduced in the second and third year (OR,0.564,95%CI 0.338-0.941;OR,0.180,95%CI 0.101-0.320,all P<0.05).For simple intravenous thrombolysis,bridging therapy was a protective factor for the improvement of treatment efficiency in the DTI process (OR,0.530,95%CI 0.297-0.943,P=0.031).Compared with the bridging therapy,the direct endovascular therapy was a protective factor for DTP treatment (OR,0.427,95%CI 0.202-0.901,P=0.025).The remaining independent variables were not associated with the occurrence of DTN and DTP delay (all P>0.05).(4) During the three years,the delay of intravenous thrombolysis was mainly due to objective reasons.The constituent ratio of other reasons caused delay of intravenous thrombolysis was decreased year by year.There was no other reasons for delay in the third year).There was no significant difference in the constituent ratio of the delay reasons in endovascular treatment (x2=3.622,P=0.164).Conclusion Under the existing process and resource allocation,setting the DTN target time and implementing continuous quality improvement are conducive to the effective implementation of brain CT scan and continuous optimization of intravenous thrombolysis in the processes in AIS patients with the first diagnosis.