The comparative analysis of the Ex and Hz fields sensitivity generated by electric dipole sources
XianXiang Wang,Jiaqi Li,Songda Lei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jge/gxae018
2024-02-03
Journal of Geophysics and Engineering
Abstract:In the CSAMT method, orthogonal electric and magnetic fields are commonly measured to determine the Cagniard apparent resistivity. However, in the near-field zone, the Cagniard resistivity is severely distorted, which is unrelated to underground structures. The E x and H z amplitudes in a homogeneous half-space monotonically vary in resistivity, and a numerical algorithm could achieve high-precision apparent resistivity without distortion for all frequencies. On this basis, the main focus of this investigation is on the comparative analysis of the sensitivity for the E x field, H z field, and Cagniard apparent resistivity to conductive and resistivity targets via synthetic models. The achieved results confirm that the E x field could exhibit a more enhanced sensitivity for the resistive objects, while the H z field could more effectively identify the conductive target. Besides, the static effect often distorts the electromagnetic data, which rigorously influences their application. The influence of the static effect on both the E x and H z fields is also examined in detail. The apparent resistivity based on the E x field and Cagniard apparent resistivity is significantly affected by the static effect, which can mask deep anomalous blocks. However, the apparent resistivity based on the H z field is almost unaffected by the static effect. Finally, a more efficient observation approach is provided for both the insulating and conductive targets.
geochemistry & geophysics