Abstract:The present paper aims to contribute to the ongoing scholarly discussion about the impact of Western concepts on the modern East Asian understanding of Buddhism. Previous studies on the intellectual and cultural history of Chinese Buddhism in China’s Republican (1911–1949) period suggest that the newly imported distinctions between religion and philosophy, and reason and faith, were instrumental in creating a new secular discourse that favoured the doctrinally orientated Buddhist traditions (notably Consciousness-only/Yogācāra) and belittled the more practical and devotional Buddhist currents (especially Pure Land Buddhism). While those observations pertain to the views of secular elites, a much more complex picture emerges from the confessional literature of the Republican period, for example Buddhist journals. As the present paper demonstrates, while some followers of the movement of ‘Consciousness-only studies’ were indeed critical of Pure Land devotionalism, they did not necessarily problematise it by appealing to the newly introduced Western conceptual framework.The first part of the present paper reexamines the devotional model of Pure Land practice associated with the influential Republican-era monk Yinguang. It argues that Yinguang’s lukewarm attitude towards intellectual approach to Buddhism was itself based in his particular interpretation of traditional Buddhist thought – especially the scholastic distinction between ‘principle’ and ‘phenomena’, and the Sinitic Buddha-Nature thought, which prioritises practical and non-conceptual wisdom over discursive knowledge. In the second part the paper turns to the critique of popular Pure Land piety undertaken by the lay Consciousness-only scholar Tang Dayuan, who opted for including doctrinal study in the practice of Pure Land Buddhism. Whereas Tang’s arguments for this case refer to the increasingly globalised and Westernised intellectual scene of Republican China, his reformist postulates mainly target the aforementioned exegetical and doctrinal assumptions that were shared by Yinguang and other Pure Land preachers. For example, Tang appears to sideline the dichotomy of principle (insight) and phenomena (practice) and opts instead for a unified standard of Pure Land practice grounded in doctrinal understanding. At the same time, he adduces Consciousness-only scholasticism to argue for a broader and more nuanced understanding of Buddhist wisdom, which includes discursive and communicable knowledge. In these respects Tang’s critique reveals a continuity between late imperial and modern Buddhist thought, both in terms of underlying concerns and the concepts that were used to articulate them.

To Establish The Middle Position On One Truth Or Two Truths?*: A Survey Based On The Mulamadhyamakakarika And Its Commentaries

Kumārajīva and Nāgārjuna on the Refutation of Annihilationism: A Comparative Inquiry into Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā and Kumārajīva’s Translation

The Problem of Apoha in Hetu-vidyā from a Phenomenological Perspective

The correlation of the concepts of Madhyamaka and Yogācāra in Nāgārjuna’s “Bodhicittavivarana”

Concerning the Truth of Premises in Buddhist Three-part Inference(Tray(?)vayava)

The Gotra Theory in the Madhyāntavibhāgaṭīkā

From Scepticism to Nihilism: A Nihilistic Interpretation of Nāgārjuna’s Refutations

Xuanzang and the Three Types of Wisdom: Learning, Reasoning, and Cultivating in Yogācāra Thought

Beyond Time, Not Before Time: The Pratyabhijñā Śaiva Critique of Dharmakīrti on the Reality of Beginningless Conceptual Differentiation

The Buddhist Sengzhao's Roots in Daoism: Ex Contradictione Nihil

Mou Zongsan's Philosophical Identification and Construction of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism, and the Judgment of Perfect Doctrine

The Huayan Understanding of One-mind and Buddhist Practice on the Basis of the Awakening of Faith

Practice and Understanding in Modern Chinese Pure Land Buddhism

How can Middle Doctrine be Metaphysics?

Mencius, Xunzi, and the Third Stage of Confucianism

Querying Mou Zongsan’s Doctrine of Xing Zhu

The Three Differences between Confucianism and Buddhism——Chu Hsi Analysis and Judgment

Advaita Epistemology and Metaphysics - A Critical Analysis

The Problem of the Relationship of Founding between Objectivating Act and Non-objectivating Act——Relationship between Cognition (vijnana) and Wisdom (jnana) from the Perspective of Vijnapti-mātratā and Phenomenology

Philosophical Reflections on "Sudden Enlightenment" and "Meditation"

The Construction of Yi Chuan’s Neo Confucianism from the Perspective of the Distinction between Confucianism and Buddhism