A Comparative Study of Representative MOOCs Projects in China and Overseas
Yan LI,Muhua ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-2179.2014.03.008
2014-01-01
Abstract:In recent years, massive open online courses ( MOOCs) have attracted world wide extensive attentions in the field of higher education. Various types of media made a large number of reports on MOOCs. Many companies also showed their interests in developing and implementing MOOCs. The United States took the lead in diffusing MOOCs practice and put forward famous projects such as Udemy, Udacity, Coursera, edX and etc. During the similar time period, some European companies, together with local higher education institutions, launched their own MOOCs pro-jects. The Ministry of Education in China and leading Chinese universities are also actively exploring MOOCs with its own features. <br> This study aims to provide useful experiences and lessons for developing MOOCs in China through reviewing the origin and connotation of MOOCs and comparing 13 representative MOOCs projects in the world. This comparative a-nalysis is conducted from three dimensions:contents, tools, and practice. The 13 selected representative MOOCs pro-jects involved in the study are Udemy、Coursera、Udacity、edX、Canvas Network, FutureLearn、OpenupEd、iversity、ALI-SON, OpenLearning and Open2Study, ewant and Xuetang online. Among these projects, five are from America, four from Europe, two from Australia, and two from China. In the dimension of content, the study compared the 13 pro-jects according to three sub-dimensions:number and types of courses provided by each project, manner of course or-ganization and the main features of course design of these projects. In the dimension of tools, the study compared the 13 projects according to three sub-dimensions: learning management system, tool development, and usage of social software. In the dimension of practice, the study compared the 13 projects according to four sub-dimensions:operators and co-operators of each project, the operating modes of each project, types of copyright protection adopted in the pro-jects, and the availability and the types of course certificates. <br> The results of the study are as follows. i) First, the number and types of courses provided by each MOOCs project varies a great deal among the 13 selected projects. Some projects provides thousands or hundreds of courses, while oth-ers provided courses no more than one hundred. In contrast, Chinese MOOCs projects are still at its starting stage and more Chinese MOOCs are expected to emerge in the near future. As to course type, some projects focuses on science, technology or business-related courses, while others focuses one humanities and social science-related courses. There are two typical manners of course organization: time-bounded or no time-bounded. There are also similarities and differences among these 13 projects in the design of course content, interaction, and assessment. ii) Second, in terms of tool usage, most of the projects don't open the source codes of their learning management systems, while all of the 13 projects adopts one or more mainstream social software, such as blog, facebook, twitter, google+, Wiki, weixin, weibo, and etc. In addition, many of the 13 projects developed a variety of online instructional or learning tools for instructors, learners or their target companies. iii) Third, most projects are still in the initial stage of implementation and most of them have not adopted the Creative Commons ( CC) for the copyright of course content. As to credits and certificates, most of the MOOCs would provide course certificates when learners successfully complete their courses and only a few of projects would offer credit certificates. Based on these findings, we propose strategies for the construction of Chinese MOOCs. i) First, course design should be learner-centered and designers should pay special attention to interaction and evaluation design for MOOCs' participants. ii) Second, developing or selecting learning management system should consider MOOCs providers' resources and there need to be a variety of online learning tools. iii) Third, Chinese institutions need to explore the operation models of various MOOCs and to seek a sustainable in developing MOOCs.