Abstract:Aflatoxins are highly toxic cancer causing fungal metabolites known to cause immune-system suppression, growth retardation, liver disease, and death in both humans and domestic animals. Human exposure to aflatoxins is limited by regulations that prohibit the use of crops containing excess quantities of aflatoxins for foods and feeds. Aflatoxins are regulated in part per billion (ppb) ranges with the maximum allowable level varying with country and intended use of the commodity. The quantity permitted in U.S. foods ranges from 0.5 ppb to 20 ppb. Aspergillus flavus, the asexual species responsible for most aflatoxin contamination of many crops, is composed of many genetic groups, called vegetative compatibility groups, that vary widely in several characteristics. Aspergillus flavus is not sufficiently aggressive as a pathogen to cause meaningful losses in yield. However, infection of crop components predisposed by stress, insect damage or the environment can result in high aflatoxin levels. Relatively small proportions of a crop infected with highly toxic isolates can result in unacceptable crop aflatoxin content. Isolates of A. flavus belonging to different vegetative compatibility groups may produce widely different quantities of aflatoxins and fungal communities resident in different areas frequently vary in average aflatoxin-producing potential. Some naturally occurring isolates of A. flavus produce no aflatoxins and are called atoxigenic strains. Certain atoxigenic strains have the ability to competitively exclude aflatoxin-producing strains during crop infection and thereby reduce aflatoxin contamination. One of these, AF36, has been registered as a biological control for the competitive exclusion of aflatoxin producing fungi from cottonseed. The registration process for AF36 that began in 1993 and extended over a decade succeeded in facilitating treatment of over 100,000 acres (Figure 1). The process was greatly facilitated by the IR-4 which served as a liaison and helped prepare and file submissions to EPA. Many atoxigenic strains are effective at reducing contamination in vitro. However, fewer are effective at reducing aflatoxin contamination during crop infection and in vitro activity does not predict in vivo activity. Laboratory, greenhouse and field plot tests indicated high efficacy of AF36 in competitively excluding aflatoxin producers and reducing aflatoxin contamination of cottonseed and corn (Figure 2). However, it was not until entire commercial cotton fields were treated under an experimental use registration that the full potential of atoxigenic strain technology became apparent. For the registration process the dynamics of population shifts in A. flavus communities was monitored carefully. The proportion of A. flavus communities composed of the highly toxigenic S strain and of AF36 were monitored prior to treatment, on the crop, and annually after treatment. AF36 was monitored by characterizing numerous A. flavus isolates by vegetative compatibility analyses. Treatments caused large reductions in the incidence of aflatoxin producers on treated crops and in soils one year after application and these changes to the A. flavus community structures were achieved without increasing the quantity of overall A. flavus present (Figure 4). These changes to the structure of A. flavus communities influence not only crop aflatoxin content, but the environment as a whole. Propagules (i.e. spores, sclerotia and mycelial fragments) of aflatoxin-producing Aspergilli contain large concentrations of aflatoxins. Thus as incidences of atoxigenic strains increase and aflatoxin-producers decrease, and incidences and concentrations of aflatoxins in the soil, air, and throughout the environment also decrease. Thus, use of the pesticide Aspergillus flavus AF36 is in the public interest. Long-term and area-wide influences of applications become an emphasis of AF36 development. Many users of atoxigenic

Biocompetitive Exclusion Of Toxigenic Fungi

Aflatoxin Reduction—A Molecular Strategy

Preharvest Aflatoxin Contamination - Molecular Strategies for Its Control

Biocontrol of Aflatoxin Production by Using Biocompetitive Agents

Competitive Exclusion of a Toxigenic Strain of <i>Aspergillus flavus</i> by an Atoxigenic Strain

Degradation of Aflatoxins B1 by Atoxigenic Aspergillus flavus Biocontrol Agents

Biological Control of Aflatoxin Contamination of Crops

DEVELOPMENT OF ASPERGILLUS FLAVUS AF36

Biotechnological advances for combating Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxin contamination in crops

Recent Progress in the Biosynthesis, Metabolism and Toxicity of Aflatoxins

Variability Among Atoxigenic Aspergillus-Flavus Strains In Ability To Prevent Aflatoxin Contamination And Production Of Aflatoxin Biosynthetic-Pathway Enzymes

Ecology of aflatoxin producing fungi and biocontrol of aflatoxin contamination

IFPRI 2 0 2 0 20 FOCUS Aflatoxins Finding Solutions for Improved Food Safety

Control of Biosynthesis of Aflatoxin in Strains of Aspergillus Flav

Aspergillus flavus diversity on crops and in the environment can be exploited to reduce aflatoxin exposure and improve health.

Co-Inoculation of Aflatoxigenic and Non-Aflatoxigenic Strains of Aspergillus flavus to Assess the Efficacy of Non-Aflatoxigenic Strains in Growth Inhibition and Aflatoxin B1 Reduction

Reduction in Aflatoxin Content of Maize by Atoxigenic Strains of Aspergillus Flavus.

Efficacy of atoxigenic Aspergillus flavus from southern China as biocontrol agents against aflatoxin contamination in corn and peanuts

Biological degradation of aflatoxins.

Biocontrol of Aspergillus and Fusarium Mycotoxins in Africa: Benefits and Limitations

Genetic Analysis of the Aspergillus Flavus Vegetative Compatibility Group to Which a Biological Control Agent That Limits Aflatoxin Contamination in U.S. Crops Belongs