Abstract:We study network pruning which aims to remove redundant channels/kernels and hence speed up the inference of deep networks. Existing pruning methods either train from scratch with sparsity constraints or minimize the reconstruction error between the feature maps of the pre-trained models and the compressed ones. Both strategies suffer from some limitations: the former kind is computationally expensive and difficult to converge, while the latter kind optimizes the reconstruction error but ignores the discriminative power of channels. In this paper, we propose a simple-yet-effective method called discrimination-aware channel pruning (DCP) to choose the channels that actually contribute to the discriminative power. To this end, we first introduce additional discrimination-aware losses into the network to increase the discriminative power of the intermediate layers. Next, we select the most discriminative channels for each layer by considering the discrimination-aware loss and the reconstruction error, simultaneously. We then formulate channel pruning as a sparsity-inducing optimization problem with a convex objective and propose a greedy algorithm to solve the resultant problem. Note that a channel (3D tensor) often consists of a set of kernels (each with a 2D matrix). Besides the redundancy in channels, some kernels in a channel may also be redundant and fail to contribute to the discriminative power of the network, resulting in kernel level redundancy. To solve this issue, we propose a discrimination-aware kernel pruning (DKP) method to further compress deep networks by removing redundant kernels. To avoid manually determining the pruning rate for each layer, we propose two adaptive stopping conditions to automatically determine the number of selected channels/kernels. The proposed adaptive stopping conditions tend to yield more efficient models with better performance in practice. Extensive experiments on both image classification and face recognition demonstrate t-e effectiveness of our methods. For example, on ILSVRC-12, the resultant ResNet-50 model with 30 percent reduction of channels even outperforms the baseline model by 0.36 percent in terms of Top-1 accuracy. We also deploy the pruned models on a smartphone (equipped with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 processor). The pruned MobileNetV1 and MobileNetV2 achieve 1.93× and 1.42× inference acceleration on the mobile device, respectively, with negligible performance degradation. The source code and the pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/SCUT-AILab/DCP.

Overview of Deep Convolutional Neural Network Pruning

Loss Constrains Added Squeeze and Excitation Blocks for Pruning Deep Neural Networks

Class-Aware Pruning for Efficient Neural Networks

Pruning by Training: A Novel Deep Neural Network Compression Framework for Image Processing.

A Feature-map Discriminant Perspective for Pruning Deep Neural Networks

A Pruning Method Based on the Dissimilarity of Angle among Channels and Filters

Pruning and quantization for deep neural network acceleration: A survey

Towards Thinner Convolutional Neural Networks Through Gradually Global Pruning

Pruning the Deep Neural Network by Similar Function

Pruning at a Glance: Global Neural Pruning for Model Compression

Cloud–Edge Collaborative Inference with Network Pruning

Where to Prune: Using LSTM to Guide Data-Dependent Soft Pruning

Discrimination-aware Network Pruning for Deep Model Compression

A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendations

Layer Pruning via Fusible Residual Convolutional Block for Deep Neural Networks

Identifying and Pruning Redundant Structures for Deep Neural Networks

Learning Low Resource Consumption CNN through Pruning and Quantization

Compact Deep Convolutional Neural Networks With Coarse Pruning

Differential Evolution Based Layer-Wise Weight Pruning for Compressing Deep Neural Networks

Modeling of Pruning Techniques for Deep Neural Networks Simplification

Frequency-Domain Dynamic Pruning for Convolutional Neural Networks