Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Interactive Price Effects Between The American & Chinese Agricultural Futures Markets

Impacts of Agricultural Price Support Policy on Price Variability and Welfare: Evidence from China's Soybean Market

Research on Price Discovery in Chinese Agricultural Commodities Futures Markets

Dynamic and Spillover Effects of USA Import Refusals on China's Agricultural Trade: Evidence from Monthly Data

Linkage relationship between China and US futures market during trade friction: the case of soybean, soybean oil and soybean meal

Cross-Market Soybean Futures Price Discovery

Study on the influence of international oil price on domestic oil price by APT-ECM

Cross-market Soybean Futures Price Discovery: Does the Dalian Commodity Exchange Affect the Chicago Board of Trade?

Uncovering the Sino-US dynamic risk spillovers effects: Evidence from agricultural futures markets

The impact of trade policy on soybean futures in China

Uncovering the Sino‐US Dynamic Risk Spillovers Effects: Evidence From Agricultural Futures Markets

Is there co-movement between the China and US agricultural futures markets?

Price Dynamics in Food-Energy Market in China

The Impact of Trade on Scale Efficiency in Grain and Oil-Bearing Plant Production in China

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

Price Discovery in the Spot -Futures Markets:An Empirical Analysis in Chinese Agricultural Products

Study of Price Discovery of China's Farm Produce Futures Based on VAR Model

Current Situation, Problems and Suggestions of Agricultural Futures Market in China

Price Transmission Analysis of the International Soybean Market in a Trade War Context

Information transmission in informationally linked markets: Evidence from US and Chinese commodity futures markets