Abstract:Digitalization has expanded the scope of citizen participation. Nevertheless, there are no conclusive findings on online citizen participation and inclusive policymaking. This study adds in line with the discussion with a fresh perspective of institutional bias. It presents new evidence by examining the process, participants, policy agenda, and sentiments of public opinions from the government-led and Internet-empowered citizen participation regarding the 2017–2035 Shanghai Master Plan. Four findings are reported based on the in-depth case study with text and sentiment analysis. First, the government-led model provides institutionalized opportunities for citizen engagement throughout the policy process, while the Internet-empowered citizen participation is characterized by contingency and ad hoc. Second, the government-led model remains elite-dominated, while the Internet empowers a wider scope of stakeholders with an open and popularized participation platform. Third, the public opinion from the Internet-empowered model often goes beyond or even against the pre-defined official principles and goals. In contrast, the civic discussion in the government-led model influences policy by changing the sequence of policy agenda or providing focus within the official setting. Fourth, citizens, especially the experts, are more likely to give positive feedback in the government-led model than the Internet-empowered approach. These findings confirm and identify the remaining institutional bias that hinders inclusive policymaking in the Internet age. Theoretically, it reminds scholars to examine the institutional arrangements regarding citizen participation carefully. Practically, it indicates that the central government could facilitate inclusive policymaking at the local level by reducing the institutional bias of the government-led approach and utilizing text and sentiment analysis to urge the local government's response to Internet-empowered public opinion.

Open Data, Crowdsourcing, And City Planning A Novel Perspective On Public Participation In Planning And Public Governance

Open Data, Crowdsourcing, and City Planning.

Applying crowdsourcing techniques in urban planning: A bibliometric analysis of research and practice prospects

SinoGrids: a Practice for Open Urban Data in China

Understanding Urban China with Open Data

A Crowd-Sourced Data Based Analytical Framework for Urban Planning

A participatory e-planning model in the urban renewal of China: Implications of technologies in facilitating planning participation

Studies and Practices of Urban Big Data and Open Data in China

Government-led and Internet-empowered Citizen Participation in China's Policymaking: A Case Study of the Shanghai 2035 Master Plan.

Unveiling citizen-government interactions in urban renewal in China: Spontaneous online opinions, reginal characteristics, and government responsiveness

A New Public Forum: Online Public Participation for Urban Planning

Transformations Of Urban Studies And Planning In The Big/Open Data Era: A Review

Civic Crowd-funding: A Participatory Mode of Urban Construction and Governance in the UK

Public Participation in Smart-City Governance: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Public Comments in Urban China

On Electronic Participation and How to Govern the Chinese City Planning

Enabling Human-Centric Smart Cities: Crowdsourcing-Based Practice in China

The Openness of China's Gated Communities from the Reflective Perspective of Border Vacuums

Smart City with Chinese Characteristics Against the Background of Big Data: Idea, Action and Risk

Citizen Participation in China’s Eco-City Development. Will ‘New-Type Urbanization’ Generate a Breakthrough in Realizing It?

Population Spatialization and Synthesis with Open Data

Crowdsourced geospatial data is reshaping urban sciences