Abstract:This review examines characterization challenges inherently associated with understanding nanomaterials and the roles surface and interface characterization methods can play in meeting some of the challenges. In parts of the research community, there is growing recognition that studies and published reports on the properties and behaviors of nanomaterials often have reported inadequate or incomplete characterization. As a consequence, the true value of the data in these reports is, at best, uncertain. With the increasing importance of nanomaterials in fundamental research and technological applications,it is desirable that researchers from the wide variety of disciplines involved recognize the nature of these often unexpected challenges associated with reproducible synthesis and characterization of nanomaterials, including the difficulties of maintaining desired materials properties during handling and processing due to their dynamic nature. It is equally valuable for researchers to understand how characterization approaches (surface and otherwise) can help to minimize synthesis surprises and to determine how (and how quickly) materials and properties change in different environments. Appropriate application of traditional surface sensitive analysis methods (including x-ray photoelectron and Auger electron spectroscopies, scanning probe microscopy, and secondary ion mass spectroscopy) can provide information that helps address several of the analysis needs. In many circumstances, extensions of traditional data analysis can provide considerably more information than normally obtained from the data collected. Less common or evolving methods with surface selectivity (e.g., some variations of nuclear magnetic resonance, sum frequency generation, and low and medium energy ion scattering) can provide information about surfaces or interfaces in working environments (operando or in situ) or information not provided by more traditional methods. Although these methods may require instrumentation or expertise not generally available, they can be particularly useful in addressing specific questions, and examples of their use in nanomaterial research are presented.

Nanomaterials for X-Ray Nanochemistry

Physical, Chemical and Biological Enhancement in X-ray Nanochemistry.

Chemical enhancement by nanomaterials under X-ray irradiation.

Synchrotron‐Based X‐ray Microscopy for Nanoscale Bioimaging

Nano/Sub-nanomaterial Chemistry

X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy in nanomaterials

Characterization challenges for nanomaterials

Synchrotron-based X-ray Microscopic Studies for Bioeffects of Nanomaterials.

Nanotechnology for Enhancing Medical Imaging

Nanoscale Scintillating Materials for X-ray Imaging: Fundamentals and Applications

Preparation and Structure Characterizations of Nanosized Materials

Nanoscale chemical imaging with structured X-ray illumination

Understanding Synthesis and Structural Variation of Nanomaterials Through in Situ/Operando XAS and SAXS

Surface Modification of Radionanomedicine

Quantifying the Nucleation and Growth Kinetics of Microwave Nanochemistry Enabled by in Situ High-Energy X-ray Scattering

Spatiotemporal Studies of Soluble Inorganic Nanostructures with X-rays and Neutrons

Surface Characterization of Nanomaterials and Nanoparticles: Important Needs and Challenging Opportunities

Exploration of Nano-Surface Chemistry for Spectral Analysis

Applications of Synchrotron‐Based Spectroscopic Techniques in Studying Nucleic Acids and Nucleic Acid‐Functionalized Nanomaterials

Nanomaterials

X-ray-Based Techniques to Study the Nano–Bio Interface