Abstract:English for foreign language (EFL) novice writer-researchers are faced with an increasing pressure for international publication as a prerequisite for sustainable career development in academia. The use of metadiscourse, as a key indicator for their discourse competence, has been a subject of research for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and/or English for Specific Purposes (ESP) scholars. This study investigates metadiscourse features of research articles' (RA) results and discussion (R&D) sections written by Chinese PhD students and their writer identities reflected through metadiscourse choice. A corpus was built, consisting of a subcorpus of R&D of unpublished research articles (RAs) written by Chinese PhD students (CNWs) and one of the same part-genre by English-speaking expert writers (EEWs). Metadiscourse used by the two groups were identified based on Hyland's interpersonal model of metadiscourse. Quantitative analyses on the frequency and variety of metadiscourse markers found a significant difference not only in interactional metadiscourse but also in some subcategories of interactive and interactional metadiscourse, indicating that CNWs attach more importance to organisation of ideas than to the persuasiveness of arguments. A questionnaire survey was conducted to explore the influence of the CNWs' perception of RA writing on their metadiscourse choice. It revealed that knowledge of generic conventions and metadiscourse functions, awareness of the writer-reader relationship, and confidence in language competence may influence metadiscourse choice. The paper concludes with the view that the CNWs generally view themselves as a recounter and reporter of their research, remaining conservative when presenting an authoritative voice and a confident identity as a knowledge creator.

Positioning and proximity of reader engagement Authorial identity in professional and apprentice academic genres

“We Must Conclude That…”: A Diachronic Study of Academic Engagement

Epistemic Positioning by Science Students and Experts: a Divide by Applied and Pure Disciplines

Epistemic Stance and Authorial Presence in Scientific Research Writing Hedges, Boosters and Self-Mentions Across Disciplines and Writer Groups

A Corpus-based Study of Engagement Resources in English Research Papers of Chinese and NSE Authors

‘As We Can See’: Reader Engagement in PhD Candidature Confirmation Reports

A Tale of Two Genres: Engaging Audiences in Academic Blogs and Three Minute Thesis Presentations

Stance in academic blogs and three‐minute theses

Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance

Stance and Engagement in 3MT Presentations: How Students Communicate Disciplinary Knowledge to a Wide Audience

Engagement in doctoral dissertation discussion sections written by English native speakers

To be like a "scholar": a study on the construction of authorial identity of Chinese EFL learners in academic writing: an intertextuality perspective

"Think about How Fascinating This Is": Engagement in Academic Blogs Across Disciplines

Prescription and Reality in Advanced Academic Writing

Sustainable Development of EFL Learners' Research Writing Competence and Their Identity Construction: Chinese Novice Writer-Researchers' Metadiscourse Use in English Research Articles

Understanding the dynamic of student engagement in project-based collaborative writing: Insights from a longitudinal case study

Positioning the reader: the effect of narrative point-of-view and familiarity of experience on situation model construction

Academic Blogging: Scholars’ Views on Interacting with Readers

Textual Organisation and Construal of Interpersonal Meanings in Different Genres of Medical Texts

Writing with Attitude: Stance Expression in Learner and Professional Dentistry Research Reports

“The Results Might Not Fully Represent…”: Negation in the Limitations Sections of Doctoral Theses by Chinese and American Students