Chinese Collegiate Fitness Index Report Based on the Supporting Active Lifestyle Perspective

Yi Liu,Xiaolei Liu,Mingxi Guan,Hao Guo,Yan Peng,Ming Yang,Jindong Chang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000536440.81086.c1
2018-01-01
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Abstract:PURPOSE: Physical activity of college students was heavily influenced by individual interest, educational policies, social support, and the physical environment (including the built environment). The purpose of this study was to assess the status of Chinese collegiate fitness and to develop a promotion strategy from the supporting active lifestyle perspective. METHODS: Drawing on National Academy of Kinesiology released the National Collegiate Fitness Index Report 2015 (NCFI) to develop Chinese collegiate fitness index (CCFI). The advisory committee members used the Delphi method to rate the importance of the fitness factors of CCFI. Finally, three domain was included in the CCFI and named transportation, exercise facilities, and physical education policies and services. A total of 789colleges and universities were surveyed, 386 were recovered, and 245 were valid questionnaires. The missing data that schools with incomplete responses were filled with the mean by SPSS24.0. The domain score was calculated by the rank of each group. RESULTS: Finally, 245 colleges and universities came from 29 Provinces, Municipalities, Autonomous Regions and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region joining in the survey. Three groups were identified according to the difference of the attribution, the difference between public and private, as well as the different institutions and vocational institutions. Among the 245 colleges and universities, 48 were recognized as the subordinate universities, 152 were determined as the provincial universities, and 45 were defined as the public vocational or private colleges. The top three of universities are (1) Tsinghua University (74.7); (2) Beijing Normal University (72.1); (3) South China University of Technology (72.0). CONCLUSIONS: There are obvious regional differences in the fitness index of Chinese collegiate (p=0.009<0.05); The fitness index of the subordinate universities was significantly higher than other two group universities (p=0.000<0.05). ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Supported by NPOPSS Grant 15CTY011, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities SWU1709240.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?