Bergson Vs Einstein: The Century Debate Between The Philosopher And The Physicist And Its Subsequent Impact

Jianhui Li

2020-01-01

Abstract:Why Einstein's relativity theory did not get the Nobel Physical Award? One reason is that Bergson, a famous philosopher, criticized it from philosophical point of view. In April 6 of 1922, a debate about the nature of time between Bergson and Einstein was broken out in France Society of Philosophy. Bergson believed that time is duration which is qualitative and cannot be measured like space. But Einstein believed that time is quantitative and can be measured by scientists. Two great man's debate had lasted only 30 minutes or more, but it ignited great influence in the following century. Bergson's criticizing to Einstein not only caused the Nobel prize of that year being not given to Einstein's relativity theory, but also influenced philosophers like Heidegger, Whitehead, Sartre, and humanists of the late "Science War". While Einstein's ideas influenced Russell, Carnap, Reichenbach and scientists of the late "Science War". The appearance of this debate is about time, but the essence is about the relationship between science and philosophy. Einstein and his supporters objected to the intervening of philosophy into science, while Bergson and his supporters believed that science is incomplete to understand the outside world and philosophy can also see the world as its subject and the philosophical knowledge is an important supplement to science. Following Einstein's thought, British scientist Stephen Hawking said that philosophy cannot do anything to answer questions of the essence of time, or more general speaking, the essence of the universe because "philosophy is dead". However, if we see Hawking's resolution of the essence of reality, we can find that Hawking's theory is too naive. Thus, philosophy cannot be dead. Philosophy can be the style of reflection and criticizing the foundation of knowledge, but it can also be the direct thinking about the essence of the world.