Comparison of prevention and treatment of portal vein thrombosis between proximal splenic vein ligation followed by postoperative transcatheter anticoagulant therapy and systemic anticoagulant therapy in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension
Yang Bu,Kejun Liu,Mingguo Tian,Baoding Li,Liyun Wang,Dong Jia,Yong Yang,Junhao Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/poh2.58
2023-09-27
Portal Hypertension and Cirrhosis
Abstract:A study on the comparison of prevention and treatment of portal venous thrombosis (PVT) between proximal splenic vein ligation (PSVL) followed by postoperative transcatheter anticoagulant therapy and systemic anticoagulant therapy in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension was carried out. PSVL during splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization followed by transcatheter anticoagulation or thrombolysis can effectively prevent and treat PVT. Aims Splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization is one of the important methods to treat hypersplenism, gastrointestinal bleeding, and other complications caused by liver cirrhosis; however, it is accompanied by a high risk of portal vein thrombosis (PVT). This study aimed to explore the preventive and therapeutic effects of proximal splenic vein ligation (PSVL) with postoperative transcatheter anticoagulant therapy (TCAT) on PVT. Methods This study retrospectively selected 143 patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension, who received splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization from June 30, 2018 to June 30, 2021. According to computed tomography photography, within 1 week before the operation, the patients were divided into a prevention group (without preoperative PVT, n = 112) and a treatment group (preoperative PVT, n = 31). Then, each group was subdivided based on the treatment and prevention measures into PSVL + TCAT (n = 70) and systemic anticoagulant therapy (SAT) subgroups (n = 73). The preventive and therapeutic effects of PSVL followed by TCAT on PVT were analyzed. Results The operation time in the PSVL + TCAT subgroups was longer than that in the SAT subgroups (185 ± 76 min vs. 161 ± 55 min; p 0.50). There was no operative death, and all patients recovered uneventfully. In the prevention group, procedure‐related complications occurred in two patients in the PSVL + TCAT subgroup (3.7% [2/54]), including one patient with slight pancreatitis and one patient with chylous leakage, owing to mobilization of the pancreas. The PVT incidence in the prevention group was significantly different between the two subgroups at postoperative 7th day, 3rd month, and 6th month (PSVL + TCAT: 0%, 11.1%, and 5.6% vs. SAT: 39.7%, 31.0%, and 20.7%, respectively; all p