Abstract:Partial weight‐bearing acetabular preservation, combined with an uncontaminated femoral head autograft for reconstructing the segmental bone defect after intra‐articular resection of the tumorous joint, is an effective approach. Objective Periacetabular tumors, especially in young to middle‐aged patients with invasive benign tumors or low‐grade malignant tumors involving type II or II + III, present significant challenges due to their rarity and the complexity of the anatomical and biomechanical structures involved. The primary difficulty lies in balancing the need to avoid unfavorable oncological outcomes while maintaining postoperative hip joint function during surgical resection. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of a surgical method involving partial weight‐bearing acetabular preservation combined with the use of an uncontaminated femoral head autograft to reconstruct the segmental bone defect after intra‐articular resection of the tumorous joint, providing a solution that ensures both oncological safety and functional preservation of the hip joint in these patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective study with a follow‐up period of at least 36 months. From January 2010 to October 2020, we reviewed 20 cases of patients under 60 year of age with periacetabular invasive benign tumors or primary low‐grade malignant tumors. All patients underwent reconstruction of the tumorous joint using autologous femoral head grafts. Data collected included patient age, gender, tumor type, preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores, Harris Hip Scores (HHS), patient survival rates, postoperative tumor recurrence, and surgical complications. To analyze the data, we utilized various statistical methods, including descriptive statistics to summarize patient demographics and clinical characteristics, and paired sample t‐tests to compare preoperative and postoperative scores. Results The study included 20 patients, and a total median follow‐up was 83 months. Their pathologic diagnoses comprised 13 giant cell tumors (GCTs), 5 chondrosarcomas, one chondroblastoma, and 1 leiomyosarcoma. Postoperatively, the median differences in vertical and horizontal center of rotation (COR) were 3.8 and 4.0 mm. Median limb length discrepancy (LLD) postoperatively was 5.7 mm (range, 2.3–17.8 mm). Two patients (10%) experienced delayed wound healing, resolved with antibiotics and early surgical debridement. One patient experienced dislocation 3 months postoperatively, which was promptly addressed under general anesthesia without further dislocation. Conclusion Through multiplanar osteotomy with limited margins, femoral head autograft, and uncemented total hip replacement for pelvic segmental bone defects in selected patients in type II or II + III appears to be an encouraging limb‐sparing surgery worthy of consideration for carefully selected patients.

Total Femur Replacement: A Limb-Saving Strategy For Patients With Primary Malignant Femoral Tumors

[Endoprosthetic Reconstruction after Wide Resection of Primary Bone Tumor Around the Knee].

Proximal Femoral Autograft for Pelvic Reconstruction after Tumor Resection

Total Femoral Replacement in Periprosthetic Femur Fracture: A Case Report

[The Surgical Therapy of Periacetabular Malignant Tumors].

Clinical outcomes of total femoral replacement. First Latin American experience

Surgical Treatment of Primary Malignant Tumours of the Distal Tibia: Clinical Outcome and Reconstructive Strategies.

Precise single column resection and reconstruction with femoral head plus total hip replacement for primary malignant peri-acetabulum tumors

Limb-Salvage Treatment of En-Block Resected Distal Femoral Tumors with Endoprosthesis of All-Polyethylene Tibial Component: a 9-Year Follow-Up Study

[Surgical Classification and Therapeutic Strategy for Metastases of Proximal Femur].

Treatment of Distal Tibial Tumor with Vascularized Fibula Reconstruction

[EVALUATION OF FIBULAR HEAD RESECTION IN PROSTHETIC REPLACEMENT FOR NEOPLASMS OF PROXIMAL TIBIA IN LIMB SALVAGE SURGERY].

Survivorship, complications, and outcomes following distal femoral replacement for neoplastic indications

Intercalary reconstruction of the distal femur with or without physeal preservation: results and impact on limb growth

Surgical Management of Metastasis in Mroximal Femur

Treatment algorithm for metastatic malignancies in the lower extremities

Surgical Options and Reconstruction Strategies for Primary Bone Tumors of Distal Tibia: A Systematic Review of Complications and Functional Outcome.

Surgical Treatment for Benign Tumor in Proximal Femur

Bipolar prosthetic replacement for proximal femoral tumors]

Short‐to‐Mid‐Term Outcomes of Ipsilateral Femoral Head Autograft Combined with Uncemented Total Hip Replacement for Partial Periacetabular Defects Following Tumor Resection

Endoprosthetic reconstruction after resection of the tumor of the proximal femur]