Magnetic Properties Of Polycrystalline Compounds Cu0.64mn0.86[Fe(Cn)(6)]Center Dot 7.2h(2)O And Cu0.84mn0.66[Fe(Cn)(6)]Center Dot 7.1h(2)O

Yanfang Xia,Ge Zhang,Min Liu,Duxin Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-019-05166-w
2019-01-01
Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism
Abstract:In this work, polycrystalline powder samples of Cu0.64Mn0.86[Fe(CN)(6)]center dot 7.2H(2)O and Cu0.84Mn0.66[Fe(CN)(6)]center dot 7.1 H2O have been synthesized by a coprecipitation method. The lattice parameter a is 10.053(8) angstrom and 10.083 angstrom for Cu0.64Mn0.86[Fe(CN)(6)]center dot 7.2H(2)O and Cu0.84Mn0.66[Fe(CN)(6)]center dot 7.1H(2)O, respectively. When the temperature reaches to 5 K, the magnetization is 7.262 emu/g and 0.142 emu/g for Cu0.64Mn0.86[Fe(CN)(6)]center dot 7.2H(2)O and Cu0.84Mn0.66[Fe(CN)(6)]center dot 7.1H(2)O, respectively. The coercive field and the remanent magnetization of Cu0.64Mn0.86[Fe(CN)(6)]center dot 7.2H(2)O are 1204 Oe and 0.382 mu(B)/fu, respectively. The coercive field and the remanent magnetization of Cu0.84Mn0.66[Fe(CN)(6)]center dot 7.1H(2)O are 833 Oe and 0.681 mu(B)/fu, respectively. In the initial magnetization curve, under the external magnetic field of 7 T, the magnetization of Cu0.64Mn0.86[Fe(CN)(6)]center dot 7.2H(2)O and Cu0.84Mn0.66[Fe(CN)(6)]center dot 7.1H(2)O is 2.13 mu(B)/fu and 2.44 mu(B)/fu, respectively. The difference between the calculated magnetic moment and the theoretical magnetic moment is quite large, which may be due to spin frustration.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?