Abstract:The severe socio-economic impact of recent earthquakes has represented a tough reality check, further confirming the mismatch between society expectations and reality of seismic performance of modern buildings. Life-safety code-compliant design criteria are not enough when dealing with new structures. To raise the bar in terms of structural safety and overall performance objectives, the renewed challenge is defining high-performance buildings able to sustain a design-level earthquake with minimum disruption of business and limited economic losses. To achieve this goal, alternative strategies might be adopted: (a) implementing more advanced design methodologies, (b) increasing the seismic design level, (c) adopting low-damage earthquake-resistant technologies. However, the common perception is that these strategies would lead to unaffordable costs. To support decision-makers, the paper develops a comprehensive parametric study to compare the cost–benefit of reinforced concrete multi-storey buildings designed for increasing levels of seismic intensities (representing a higher seismicity zone or Importance Class) and according to alternative design approaches (Force-based vs. Displacement-based) and technologies (traditional vs. low-damage). Analytical/numerical investigations are carried out to determine the building performance, and loss assessment analyses are performed to compute the Expected Annual Losses of all the parametric configurations. Results, further elaborated through a machine-learning technique, highlight the convenience of implementing more advanced design methodologies, such as a displacement-based approach allowing for a better control of the building response, and the remarkable benefits of applying low-damage technologies, leading to a very high performance and significantly reduced economic losses (> 50%) for a small increase (< 5–10%) of the initial investment cost.

Applications of Seismic Resilience for Health Care Facilities and School Buildings

Utilizing Base-Isolation Systems to Increase Earthquake Resiliency of Healthcare and School Buildings

Raising the bar in seismic design: cost–benefit analysis of alternative design methodologies and earthquake-resistant technologies

Seismic Resilience of a Health care facility

1 Seismic Resilience of a Regional System of Hospitals

Seismic resilience of health care facilities

MCEER ’ s vision on the seismic resilience of health care facilities

Functionality Loss and Recovery Time Models for Structural Elements, Non-Structural Components, and Delay Times to Estimate the Seismic Resilience of Mexican School Buildings

A Framework to Assess the Seismic Resilience of Urban Hospitals

Comparative Assessment of Performance-Based Design Methodologies Applied to a R.C. Shear-Wall Building

Seismic Performance Of Health Care Facilities Using Discrete Event Simulation Models

Evaluating alternative approaches for the seismic design of structures

Seismic Resilience of a Hospital System

Quantitative Evaluation and Improvement of Seismic Resilience of a Tall Frame Shear Wall Structure

Cascading Hazard Analysis of a Hospital Building

Energy-based seismic design: Needs of energy damage index values for serviceability and ultimate limit states for gravity design buildings?

Performance Evaluation of Cwh Base Isolated Building During Two Major Earthquakes in Christchurch

Seismic Resilience Assessment of Buildings Considering the Effects of Mainshock and Multiple Aftershocks

Disaster Resilience Assessment of Building and Transportation System

Toward functional recovery performance in the seismic design of modern tall buildings

Shear walls optimization in a reinforced concrete framed building for seismic risk reduction