Endoscopic Retrolabyrinthine Craniotomy for Exposure of the Trigeminal Nerve Root Entry Zone: Volumetric Analysis of Anatomic Exposure in the Cadaver

Dominic Chau,Adam Olszewski,Anna K. D'Agostino,Susan Ellsperman,William H. Slattery,Gregory P. Lekovic
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001153
IF: 2.817
2024-04-30
Operative Neurosurgery
Abstract:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Exposure of the root entry zone (REZ) of the trigeminal nerve (TN) for microvascular decompression is commonly obtained with a retrosigmoid approach, with or without endoscopic assistance. We hypothesized that adequate exposure of the TN REZ could be obtained through an endoscopic retrolabyrinthine (RL) approach. We aim to quantify exposure of the REZ of the TN using endoscopic RL approach, with and without drilling of the suprameatal tubercle of the internal auditory canal. METHODS: Surgical dissection was performed bilaterally on 3 embalmed cadaveric human heads at the anatomy laboratory of the House Institute. Heads were scanned for volumetric analysis using 3D Slicer software both before and after dissection. Extent of exposure was quantified in 2 ways: first, by assessment of the surgeon's ability to visualize 16 predetermined anatomic landmarks with the endoscope and second, we estimated the “working” area by placing fiducials under the fully endoscopic view and calculating the resultant 3D volume. RESULTS: Using the standard endoscopic RL approach, an average of 13.8 landmarks (range 12-16) was visualized. The estimated working volume exposed by the RL on each side of each head varied from 189.28 to 527.85 mm 3 . Drilling of the suprameatal tubercle provided both increases in landmark visualization and, on average, an additional 55 mm 3 of working volume. CONCLUSION: The endoscopic RL approach is a viable alternative to the standard retrosigmoid approach. Potential advantages of the RL include a more lateral trajectory that minimizes the need for cerebellar retraction and a shorter working distance and shallower angle to the cerebellopontine angle. Potential disadvantages include longer surgery time, increased technical difficulty of exposure, and potential for cerebrospinal fluid leak and or hearing loss.
surgery,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?