Impact of Environmental Decentralization on Pollution Reduction Effects in China:A Test Based on Spatial Dynamic Panel Model
XU Hui,WANG Chengliang,FENG Guoqiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18402/resci.2021.06.06
2021-01-01
Abstract:： There is no consensus in the literature on the role of environmental decentralization in pollution reduction and control, and whether it can become an important driver of decentralized incentives in pollution control. Based on the data from 2001 to 2016 at the provincial level of China, this study examined the environmental regulatory authority and the allocation pattern of the three regulatory powers at the provincial level, and regressed PM2.5, wastewater discharge per capita, general industrial solid waste output per capita, which represent air pollution, water pollution and solid waste pollution respectively, with the spatial dynamic panel model to test the role and mechanism of environmental decentralization. The results show that: (1) Environmental decentralization weakened the effect of pollution reduction. The higher the degree of decentralization is, the higher the degree of pollution of PM2.5, water pollution, and solid waste pollution. Of these, decentralization had the greatest effect on PM2.5 and the least effect on water pollution; (2) The relationship between air pollution and environmental decentralization showed a nonlinear inverted- U trend, and water pollutant and solid waste pollution and environmental decentralization did not show a significant nonlinear relationship; (3) The decentralization of environmental law enforcement power, monitoring power, and supervision power had a significantly negative impact on pollution reduction, among which the environmental law enforcement power played the largest role, and the supervision power played the smallest role; (4) Environmental decentralization weakened the effect of pollution reduction, but when the decentralization incentives of economic affairs were taken into account in the model, environmental decentralization showed a negative effect on decentralization incentives and collusion in pollution control. The policy implications of these results are: to further improve the implementation effect of environmental protection policies and the implementation ability of local governments in pollution reduction and control, it is inevitable to carry out substantive vertical system reform for environmental protection institutions. Combined with the decentralization incentive of regional economic development, it is appropriate to provide flexibility to the implementation of local environmental protection policies, which can also improve the pollution reduction and control effect to a certain extent.