A Short Length of Gonadotropin Hyperstimulation is Sufficient to Achieve an Optimal IVF Outcome in Advance-Aged Women

Le Tien Hsu,Tzu Hsuan Chin,Shang Yu Huang,Lan Yan Yang,Yu Bin Pan,Chia Lin Chang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2021.09.002
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To analyze the duration of gonadotropin hyperstimulation's impacts on oocyte quality and clinical outcomes in aged in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients. Materials and methods: This retrospective study was carried out using IVF records of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital IVF center from January 2017 to December 2019. A total of 308 IVF cycles with patients aged 40-44 years were included. Clinical characteristics of patients who received a short controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) (i.e., 6-7 days; s-COH group) or a long COH treatment (i.e., 9-10 days; l-COH group) were compared. In addition, analysis was conducted using data within two age subgroups: 40-42 years and 42-44 years subgroups. Results: The s-COH group received significantly lower total doses of gonadotropin and had smaller leading follicles at the time of ovulation trigger when compared to the l-COH group. The s-COH group also produced a significantly lower number of oocytes, mature metaphase II (MII) oocytes, and 2 PN zygotes compared to the l-COH group. However, there was no significant difference in the number of transferable and good-quality embryos between the two treatment groups. Likewise, the pregnancy rate and live birth rate were comparable in the s-COH and l-COH groups. Similar results were obtained when the analysis was limited to select age subgroups (i.e., 40-42 and 42-44 years subgroups). Conclusion: While a long COH generates more oocytes per cycle, a 6-7 days COH treatment, which is at the lower end of the recommended window of stimulation, could achieve a pregnancy outcome comparable to that applied 9-10 days of COH in aged patients. (c) 2021 Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?