Abstract:Background The success of a Mendelian randomization (MR) study critically depends on the validity of the assumptions underlying MR. We focus on detecting heterogeneity (also known as horizontal pleiotropy) in two‐sample summary‐data MR. A popular approach is to apply Cochran's Q statistic method, developed for meta‐analysis. However, Cochran's Q statistic, including its modifications, is known to lack power when its degrees of freedom are large. Furthermore, there is no theoretical justification for the claimed null distribution of the minimum of the modified Cochran's Q statistic with exact weighting (Qmin ), although it seems to perform well in simulation studies. Method The principle of our proposed method is straightforward: if a set of variables are valid instruments, then any linear combination of these variables is still a valid instrument. Specifically, this principle holds when these linear combinations are formed using eigenvectors derived from a variance matrix. Each linear combination follows a known normal distribution from which a p value can be calculated. We use the minimum p value for these eigenvector‐based linear combinations as the test statistic. Additionally, we explore a modification of the modified Cochran's Q statistic by replacing the weighting matrix with a truncated singular value decomposition. Results Extensive simulation studies reveal that the proposed methods outperform Cochran's Q statistic, including those with modified weights, and MR‐PRESSO, another popular method for detecting heterogeneity, in cases where the number of instruments is not large or the Wald ratios take two values. We also demonstrate these methods using empirical examples. Furthermore, we show that Qmin does not follow, but is dominated by, the claimed null chi‐square distribution. The proposed methods are implemented in an R package iGasso. Conclusions Dimension reduction techniques are useful for generating powerful tests of heterogeneity in MR.

WMW-A: Rank-based two-sample independent test for smallsample sizes through an auxiliary sample

Identifying Differentially Expressed Genes in RNA Sequencing Data with Small Labelled Samples

A doubly robust estimator for the Mann Whitney Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test when applied for causal inference in observational studies

On two-sample testing for data with arbitrarily missing values

A new class of robust two-sample Wald-type tests

An adaptively weighted statistic for detecting differential gene expression when combining multiple transcriptomic studies

A Shrinkage Method for Testing the Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium in Case‐Control Studies

Extending the Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test to Longitudinal Regression Analysis

A Comparative Review of Methods for Comparing Means Using Partially Paired Data

A web application for sample size and power calculation in case-control microbiome studies

On the Exploration of Local Significant Differences for Two-Sample Test.

Sample size determination based on rank tests in clinical trials.

MMD Two-sample Testing in the Presence of Arbitrarily Missing Data

WIKS: A general Bayesian nonparametric index for quantifying differences between two populations

Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method

A W-test collapsing method for rare variant testing with applications to exome sequencing data of hypertensive disorder

Powerful Test of Heterogeneity in Two‐Sample Summary‐Data Mendelian Randomization

A powerful MAF-neutral allele-based test for case-control association studies

Precise and accurate power of the rank-sum test for a continuous outcome

Using a monotonic density ratio model to increase the power of the goodness-of-fit test for logistic regression models with case-control data

A Modified Debiased Inverse‐Variance Weighted Estimator in Two‐Sample Summary‐Data Mendelian Randomization