Abstract:In this study, we find no evidence for trade‐offs between parental behaviours or between parental care and post‐breeding lifespan. Instead, the positive relationships between these traits suggest that variation in care was mainly driven by individual differences in parental quality. Our results thus indicate that high intraspecific variation in parental quality can mask reproductive investment trade‐offs within populations. The existence of life‐history trade‐offs is a fundamental assumption of evolutionary biology and behavioural ecology, yet empirical studies have found mixed evidence for this. Such trade‐offs are expected when individuals vary in how they allocate their limited resource budgets between different life‐history functions (variation in resource allocation), but they may be masked when individuals vary in how many resources they have acquired that they can later allocate to life‐history functions (variation in resource acquisition). We currently lack studies on the extent to which individual differences in behaviour reflect variation between individuals in resource acquisition and resource allocation. Here, we use parental care as a case study for exploring this question. We used the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides, which exhibits facultative biparental care, comprising direct care (provisioning food or interacting with larvae) and indirect care (guarding or maintaining the carcass). We found some evidence for a positive relationship between these two components of care for both male and female parents. In addition, parents that spent more time providing care 24 h after hatching also tended to provide care for longer. Lastly, parents that provided more parental care did not experience a trade‐off of reduced lifespan after the breeding attempt. On the contrary, we found a positive relationship between the duration of care provided and parents' post‐breeding lifespan. Our finding of positive relationships between parental behaviours and between parental care and lifespan suggests that variation in care was mainly driven by differences in prior resource acquisition (i.e., parental quality) among individuals rather than differences in resource allocation. Our findings thus suggest that high intraspecific variation in parental quality can potentially mask reproductive investment trade‐offs within populations.

How do ecological and social environments reflect parental roles in birds? A comparative analysis

Sex differences in avian parental care patterns vary across the breeding cycle

Who cares? Elucidating parental care evolution in extant birds

Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds

Ecological and social factors lead to variation in parental care between sexes in a burying beetle

Effects of season length and uniparental care efficacy on the evolution of parental care

Transient polymorphisms in parental care strategies drive divergence of sex roles

Parental behavior and newborn attachment in birds: life history traits and endocrine responses

The causes and implications of sex role diversity in shorebird breeding systems

Mortality costs of parental care and sexual dimorphism in birds

The origin of parental care in relation to male and female life history

May brood desertion be ruled by partner parenting capability in a polygamous songbird? An experimental study

The evolution of reversed sex roles and classical polyandry: Insights from coucals and other animals

The evolution of exceptional diversity in parental care and fertilization modes in ray-finned fishes

Emergence of alternative offspring care patterns from the evolution of parental negotiation strategies

Intraspecific Variation in Parental Care May Reflect Variation in Parental Quality

A diagnosis model of parental care: how parents optimize their provisioning strategy in brood reduction?

What Amphibians Can Teach Us About the Evolution of Parental Care

Parental care shapes the evolution of molecular genetic variation

Sex differences in life history drive evolutionary transitions among maternal, paternal, and bi-parental care

Not all sex ratios are equal: the Fisher condition, parental care and sexual selection