SMR-Portal: an online platform for integrative analysis of GWAS and xQTL data to identify complex trait genes
Yazhou Guo,Tao Xu,Jie Luo,Zhuqing Jiang,Wenhao Chen,Hui Chen,Ting Qi,Jian Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02561-7
IF: 48
2024-12-03
Nature Methods
Abstract:Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified numerous genetic variants associated with human complex traits, including diseases 1,2 , yet identifying the causal genes underlying the GWAS signals remains challenging 3 . Various statistical methods have been developed to integrate GWAS and molecular quantitative trait locus (xQTL) data to prioritize genes underlying GWAS signals 4 . Among these methods, summary-data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) 5,6,7 is noted for its effectiveness in detecting gene–trait associations and its heterogeneity in dependent instrument (HEIDI) test for distinguishing pleiotropy (that is, a shared causal variant between the GWAS and expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) signals at a locus) from linkage (that is, GWAS and eQTL signals at a locus driven by distinct causal variants). The SMR method relies on two assumptions: (i) the genetic variant is associated with gene expression, thereby necessitating a stringent eQTL P -value threshold, and (ii) GWAS and eQTL samples are independent, although our previous work has demonstrated that the method maintains robustness despite sample overlap 6 . While the SMR software tool is user-friendly and does not require access to individual-level GWAS or eQTL data, the data analysis process still presents certain challenges. First, it necessitates a large reference sample with individual-level genotypes to compute linkage disequilibrium for the HEIDI test. Second, it often requires extensive xQTL datasets, potentially covering multiple tissues and omics levels. A more daunting task is the visualization of SMR results, which involves integrating diverse data sources, such as GWAS, xQTL, SMR summary statistics, and tissue- or cell-specific epigenomic data.
biochemical research methods