Abstract:Background: Since the structure of proteins is more conserved than the sequence, the identification of conserved three-dimensional (3D) patterns among a set of proteins, can be important for protein function prediction, protein clustering, drug discovery and the establishment of evolutionary relationships. Thus, several computational applications to identify, describe and compare 3D patterns (or motifs) have been developed. Often, these tools consider a 3D pattern as that described by the residues surrounding co-crystallized/docked ligands available from X-ray crystal structures or homology models. Nevertheless, many of the protein structures stored in public databases do not provide information about the location and characteristics of ligand binding sites and/or other important 3D patterns such as allosteric sites, enzyme-cofactor interaction motifs, etc. This makes necessary the development of new ligand-independent methods to search and compare 3D patterns in all available protein structures. Results: Here we introduce Geomfinder, an intuitive, flexible, alignment-free and ligand-independent web server for detailed estimation of similarities between all pairs of 3D patterns detected in any two given protein structures. We used around 1100 protein structures to form pairs of proteins which were assessed with Geomfinder. In these analyses each protein was considered in only one pair (e.g. in a subset of 100 different proteins, 50 pairs of proteins can be defined). Thus: (a) Geomfinder detected identical pairs of 3D patterns in a series of monoamine oxidase-B structures, which corresponded to the effectively similar ligand binding sites at these proteins; (b) we identified structural similarities among pairs of protein structures which are targets of compounds such as acarbose, benzamidine, adenosine triphosphate and pyridoxal phosphate; these similar 3D patterns are not detected using sequence-based methods; (c) the detailed evaluation of three specific cases showed the versatility of Geomfinder, which was able to discriminate between similar and different 3D patterns related to binding sites of common substrates in a range of diverse proteins. Conclusions: Geomfinder allows detecting similar 3D patterns between any two pair of protein structures, regardless of the divergency among their amino acids sequences. Although the software is not intended for simultaneous multiple comparisons in a large number of proteins, it can be particularly useful in cases such as the structure-based design of multitarget drugs, where a detailed analysis of 3D patterns similarities between a few selected protein targets is essential.

Defining a Global Map of Functional Group Based 3D Ligand-binding Motifs

LibME—automatic Extraction of 3D Ligand‐binding Motifs for Mechanistic Analysis of Protein–ligand Recognition

Classification of likely functional class for ligand binding sites identified from fragment screening

An Automatable Analytical Algorithm for Structure-Based Protein Functional Annotation via Detection of Specific Ligand 3D Binding Sites: Application to ATP (ser/thr Protein Kinases) and GTP (Small Ras-type G-Proteins) Binding Sites

Protein-protein interface analysis and hot spots identification for chemical ligand design.

Expanding FTMap for Fragment-Based Identification of Pharmacophore Regions in Ligand Binding Sites

Decision tree-based identification of important molecular fragments for protein-ligand binding

Prediction of Flavin Mononucleotide (FMN) Binding Sites in Proteins Using the 3D Search Motif Method and Double-Centroid Reduced Representation of Protein 3D Structures

Molecule Generation For Target Protein Binding with Structural Motifs

DrugMGR: a deep bioactive molecule binding method to identify compounds targeting proteins

Predicting Protein-Ligand Binding Sites Based on an Improved Geometric Algorithm

Fragment-Based Computational Method for Designing GPCR Ligands

Geomfinder: a multi-feature identifier of similar three-dimensional protein patterns: a ligand-independent approach

Predicting Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity via Joint Global-Local Interaction Modeling

Leveraging nonstructural data to predict structures and affinities of protein-ligand complexes

Fingerprinting Interactions between Proteins and Ligands for Facilitating Machine Learning in Drug Discovery

Functional mapping of the 14-3-3 hub protein as a guide to design 14-3-3 molecular glues

High end GPCR design: crafted ligand design and druggability analysis using protein structure, lipophilic hotspots and explicit water networks

Current Advances in Ligand‐based Target Prediction

A Generalized Protein-Ligand Scoring Framework with Balanced Scoring, Docking, Ranking and Screening Powers.

LigBind: Identifying Binding Residues for Over 1000 Ligands with Relation-A-ware Graph Neural Networks