Variations and Sources of Organic Aerosol in Winter Beijing underMarkedly Reduced Anthropogenic Activities During COVID-2019

Ruolan Hu,Shuxiao Wang,Haotian Zheng,Bin Zhao,Chengrui Liang,Xing Chang,Yueqi Jiang,Rujing Yin,Jingkun Jiang,Jiming Hao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05125
IF: 11.4
2022-01-01
Environmental Science & Technology
Abstract:The COVID-19 outbreak provides a"controlledexperiment"to investigate the response of aerosol pollution to thereduction of anthropogenic activities. Here we explore thechemical characteristics, variations, and emission sources oforganic aerosol (OA) based on the observation of air pollutantsand combination of aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) and positivematrix factorization (PMF) analysis in Beijing in early 2020. Byeliminating the impacts of atmospheric boundary layer and theSpring Festival, we found that the lockdown effectively reducedcooking-related OA (COA) but influenced fossil fuel combustionOA (FFOA) very little. In contrast, both secondary OA (SOA)and O3formation was enhanced significantly after lockdown: less-oxidized oxygenated OA (LO-OOA, 37% in OA) was probably anaged product from fossil fuel and biomass burning emission with aqueous chemistry being an important formation pathway, whilemore-oxidized oxygenated OA (MO-OOA, 41% in OA) was affected by regional transport of air pollutants and related with bothaqueous and photochemical processes. Combining FFOA and LO-OOA, more than 50% of OA pollution was attributed tocombustion activities during the whole observation period. Ourfindings highlight that fossil fuel/biomass combustion are still thelargest sources of OA pollution, and only controlling traffic and cooking emissions cannot efficiently eliminate the heavy air pollutionin winter Beijing
What problem does this paper attempt to address?