Abstract:Data privacy, especially location privacy, is paramountly important for protecting individual’s information in smart cities in the big data era. One of the examples is in spatial crowdsourcing (SC). It enables people not only to issue spatiotemporal tasks to ask for help as requesters but also to solve others’ tasks as workers on the SC platform. While SC brings convenience to people, it also produces severe location privacy problems, which have been recently paid more attention from both academia and industries. In this article, we address the location privacy problem in SC in a practical and secure way. We propose a location privacy-preserving framework for almost all existed mainstream distance computations in the SC system, namely, Euclidean-L3P, Minkowski-L3P, Manhattan-L3P, and Chebyshev-L3P, among which the first two are constructed based on homomorphic encryption and composite-order multilinear mapping while the latter two on the homomorphic encryption and prefix membership verification approach. Location privacy is resolved because of the above techniques having enabled that all distance computations are evaluated through ciphertexts without disclosing any location information. Security analysis shows that our framework can prevent a strong adversary from obtaining participants’ location privacy. Performance analysis evaluates computation and communication overheads between protocols. The results show that Euclidean-L3P is more efficient than Manhattan-L3P and Chebyshev-L3P in terms of computation overheads when the SC applications require a small number of participants, a large plaintext space, and a small number of base stations. Moreover, compared with Manhattan-L3P and Chebyshev-L3P, Euclidean-L3P is a better choice in terms of communication overhead.

From Centralized Protection to Distributed Edge Collaboration: A Location Difference-Based Privacy-Preserving Framework for Mobile Crowdsensing.

Group Effect-Based Privacy-Preserving Data Aggregation for Mobile Crowdsensing

Differential Location Privacy for Sparse Mobile Crowdsensing

Participant Grouping for Privacy Preservation in Mobile Crowdsensing over Hierarchical Edge Clouds.

Location privacy protection method based on differential privacy in crowdsensing task allocation

A Privacy-Preserving Incentive Mechanism for Mobile Crowdsensing Based on Blockchain

Spatiotemporal Location Privacy Preservation in 5G-Enabled Sparse Mobile Crowdsensing

P2AE: Preserving Privacy, Accuracy, and Efficiency in Location-dependent Mobile Crowdsensing

When Crowdsensing Meets Federated Learning: Privacy-Preserving Mobile Crowdsensing System

When Mobile Crowdsensing Meets Privacy

BPPF: Bilateral Privacy-Preserving Framework for Mobile Crowdsensing

Privacy-preserving Task Allocation for Edge Computing-Based Mobile Crowdsensing.

Location Privacy-Preserving Distance Computation for Spatial Crowdsourcing

A differential privacy location protect approach with intelligence data collection paradigm for MCS

A Privacy-Preserving Data Aggregation of Mobile Crowdsensing Based on Local Differential Privacy

Privacy-Preserving Personal Sensitive Data in Crowdsourcing

Q-BLPP: A Quality-Enabled Bilateral Location Privacy-Preserving Service Construction Scheme in Mobile Crowd Sensing

Privacy protection federated learning system based on blockchain and edge computing in mobile crowdsourcing

Privacy-preserving Mobile Crowd Sensing for Big Data Applications

Blockchain and Federated Edge Learning for Privacy-Preserving Mobile Crowdsensing

Locally Differentially Private Participant Recruitment for Mobile Crowdsourcing.