Abstract:Background Anastomotic stenosis following surgical intervention for colorectal cancer is a frequently encountered complication. Nevertheless, the optimal approach to effectively manage anastomotic stenosis at varying distances from the anal margin remains uncertain. The primary objective of this research endeavor was to explore the risk factors associated with recurrent anastomotic stenosis subsequent to colorectal cancer surgery, as well as to evaluate potential strategies for its management. Methods The present study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and treatment outcomes of 244 patients who underwent colorectal surgery and were subsequently diagnosed with anastomotic stenosis. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the location of anastomotic stenosis relative to the anal verge: the low anastomotic stenosis group ( n = 107) and the high anastomotic stenosis group ( n = 137). Results The severity of anastomotic stenosis was found to be significantly higher in the low anastomotic stenosis group compared to the high anastomotic stenosis group (71.0% vs 57.7%, P = 0.031). Furthermore, the high anastomotic stenosis group exhibited a greater inclination toward opting for endoscopic treatment when it came to the choice of treatment for anastomotic stenosis (62.8% vs 27.1%, P < 0.001). In addition, logistic regression analysis showed that stenosis length ≥ 0.8 cm (odds ratio = 0.481; 95% CI = 0.248–0.936; P = 0.031) and lymph node metastasis (OR = 0.559, 95%CI = 0.313–0.998, P = 0.049) were independent risk factor for recurrence of anastomotic stenosis. Finally further build colorectal surgery of tumor recurrent anastomotic stenosis nomogram prediction model, using the internal validation and calculation model of the receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) area under curve (AUC) to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of the model. Conclusion There exist variations in the severity of anastomotic stenosis, the extent of stenosis, and the selection of treatment modalities across different anatomic locations. Regarding the choice of anastomotic treatment, patients with elevated anastomotic stenosis exhibited a preference for endoscopic intervention. Furthermore, a multivariate analysis showed that stenosis length equal to or greater than 0.8 cm and lymph node metastasis were autonomous risk factors for recurrence of benign stenosis after colorectal cancer surgery.

Endoscopic Stricturotomy for Patients With Postoperative Benign Anastomotic Stricture for Colorectal Cancer

Therapy for Benign Rectal Anastomotic Stricture after Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Strictureplasty in the surgical management of Crohn′s disease

Clinical Efficacy of Endoscopic Technique in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Complications: a Retrospective Study

[Efficacy and Safety of Digestive Tract Stent Placement under Direct Visual Endoscopy Without X-ray Monitoring in Treatment of Digestive Tract Stricture].

Strictureplasty May Lead to Increased Preference in the Surgical Management of Crohn’s Disease: a Case-Matched Study

Analysis of treatment methods and relapse factors of postoperative anastomotic stenosis in colorectal cancer

Management of benign anastomotic stenosis after rectal cancer surgery

Endoscopic Stricturotomy in the Treatment of Refractory Esophageal Anastomotic Strictures

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided colo-colostomy for the treatment of benign complete occlusion of colonic anastomosis: a case series and description of technique

Technical risk factors for benign anastomotic strictures in colorectal and/or coloanal anastomosis: A retrospective case–control study

Endoscopic therapy of stoma closure site strictures in ileal pouches is safe and effective

Risk Factors for Benign Anastomotic Stricture Post-Oesophagectomy: Single-Centre Analysis of 702 Oesophagectomies with Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Clinical Effectiveness of Endoscopic Stent Placement in Treatment of Acute Intestinal Obstruction Caused by Colorectal Cancer

Risk factors of postoperative stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms: A meta-analysis

Endoscopic Management of Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Anastomosis Strictures: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Literature

Effects of Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation on Treatment of Benign Stenosis of Colorectal Anastomosis: a Retrospective Study

Endoscopic Radial Incision Versus Endoscopic Balloon Dilation As Initial Treatments of Benign Esophageal Anastomotic Stricture.

Risk factors for the failure of endoscopic balloon dilation to manage anastomotic stricture from colorectal surgery: retrospective cohort study

Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of complete anastomosis stenosis after colorectal resection without protective ileostomy: report of two cases and literature review.

Endoscopic treatment of benign ureterointestinal anastomotic stricture