Close, Bright and Boxy: the Superluminous SN 2018Hti

A. Fiore,S. Benetti,M. Nicholl,A. Reguitti,E. Cappellaro,S. Campana,S. Bose,E. Paraskeva,E. Berger,T. M. Bravo,J. Burke,Y-Z Cai,T-W Chen,P. Chen,R. Ciolfi,S. Dong,S. Gomez,M. Gromadzki,C. P. Gutierrez,D. Hiramatsu,G. Hosseinzadeh,D. A. Howell,A. Jerkstrand,E. Kankare,A. Kozyreva,K. Maguire,C. McCully,P. Ochner,C. Pellegrino,G. Pignata,R. S. Post,N. Elias-Rosa,M. Shahbandeh,S. Schuldt,B. P. Thomas,L. Tomasella,J. Vinko,C. Vogl,J. C. Wheeler,D. R. Young
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac744
IF: 4.8
2022-01-01
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Abstract:SN 2018hti was a very nearby (z=0.0614) superluminous supernova with an exceedingly bright absolute magnitude of -21.7 mag in r-band at maximum. The densely sampled pre-maximum light curves of SN 2018hti show a slow luminosity evolution and constrain the rise time to 50 rest-frame days. We fitted synthetic light curves to the photometry to infer the physical parameters of the explosion of SN 2018hti for both the magnetar and the CSM-interaction scenarios. We conclude that one of two mechanisms could be powering the luminosity of SN 2018hti; interaction with 10 Msun of circumstellar material or a magnetar with a magnetic field of B_p 1.3e13 G and initial period of P_spin 1.8 ms. From the nebular spectrum modelling we infer that SN 2018hti likely results from the explosion of a 40 Msun progenitor star.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?