Abstract:This two-armed study was designed to determine whether recovery after esophageal resection may be improved by introducing a new multimodal approach. For 8 mo after the new approach was introduced, all patients undergoing abdominothoracic esophageal resection were studied (Group 2; n = 42). For comparison, a retrospective analysis was also conducted using the data of all patients who had undergone this operation in the 8 mo before the introduction of the new regimen, when the traditional therapy was still in use (Group 1; n = 49). All patients received an epidural catheter at the level of T6-9 before the induction of general analgesia. Afterward, Group 1 patients were operated under general anesthesia. For postoperative pain relief, a mixture of bupivacaine 1.25 mg/mL and sufentanil 1 microg/mL was administered during 5 days without titration of the quality of analgesia. Patients in Group 2 received a preoperative bolus of 10-15 mL bupivacaine 2.5 mg/mL and 20-30 microg sufentanil. After sensory block up to T4 was confirmed, general anesthesia was introduced and intraoperatively combined with a continuous infusion of 5 mL/h of a solution containing bupivacaine 1.75 mg/mL and sufentanil 1 microg/mL. Postoperatively, the epidural infusion rate was adjusted to the need of the individual patients, who were able to administer themselves additional bolus doses of 2 mL with a lockout time of 20 min. Early tracheal extubation and forced mobilization were pursued to improve recovery. Demographic data of both groups were comparable. The pain relief of Group 2 patients was superior to that of patients in Group 1. The nitrogen balance of a subgroup of nine matched pairs of patients with comparable nutritional status was less negative in Group 2 patients on Postoperative Days 1 and 2. Patients in Group 2 were tracheally extubated earlier (mean 6.7 vs 25.1 h after admission to the intensive care unit [ICU]), mobilized earlier (mean 1.2 vs 2.0 days after surgery), discharged from the ICU earlier (mean 1.7 vs 4.0 days), and fulfilled criteria for discharge from the ICU (mean 1.8 vs 4.1 days) and from the intermediate care unit earlier (4.9 vs 6.4 days). We conclude that the multimodal approach may improve recovery and thus reduce costs after abdominothoracic esophageal resection.IMPLICATIONS: Analgesia and blockade of the perioperative stress response, combined with other aspects of postoperative therapy, may improve recovery after surgery. The intensive care unit stay after esophageal resection was reduced by a new regimen (thoracic epidural analgesia, early tracheal extubation, forced mobilization). This approach may influence the cost of major surgery.

Active Cycle of Breathing Technique May Reduce Pulmonary Complications after Esophagectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Impact of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation and Long-Term Mortality in Patients among Esophageal Cancer.

Enhancement of Pulmonary Function and Reduction of Complications Through EIT-Guided Yoga Breathing Exercise After Esophagectomy

Comparative efficacy of different combinations of acapella, active cycle of breathing technique, and external diaphragmatic pacing in perioperative patients with lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial

Outcomes of early fiberoptic bronchoscopic sputum aspiration and lavage after thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophageal cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial

Prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications through intensive preoperative respiratory rehabilitation in patients with esophageal cancer

Effect of Using the Active Cycle of Breathing Technique Combined with Watson's Theory of Human Caring in Rapid Patient Rehabilitation Following Lung Cancer Surgery

A Multimodal Approach to Control Postoperative Pathophysiology and Rehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Abdominothoracic Esophagectomy

Ultra-short-period Perioperative Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Short-Term Outcomes after Surgery in Smoking Patients with Lung Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Aggressive intraoperative warming and postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients recovering from esophageal cancer surgery: sub-analysis of a randomized trial

Inspiratory Muscle Training Before Esophagectomy Increases Diaphragmatic Excursion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Improves Short-term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy

Analysis of Risk Factors for Acute Lung Injury/acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome after Esophagectomy

The Impact of Tidal Volume on Pulmonary Complications Following Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: a Randomized and Controlled Study.

The Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of Perioperative Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients With Lung Cancer Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Effectiveness of the Tailored, Early Comprehensive Rehabilitation Program (t-ECRP) based on ERAS in improving the physical function recovery for patients following minimally invasive esophagectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Impact and effect of preoperative short term preoperative pulmonary-related training on gastric cancer patients: a randomized controlled single center trial

Feasibility Research of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Implemented in Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Underwent Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Impact of breathing exercises in subjects with lung cancer undergoing surgical resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy and complications of endoscopic thoracoscopic versus laparoscopic radical esophagectomy in esophageal cancer treatment: A retrospective study