Abstract:Introduction: Hearing loss is a major global public health issue that negatively impacts quality of life, communication, cognition, social participation, and mental health. The cochlear implant (CI) is the most efficacious treatment for severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. However, variability in outcomes remains high among CI users. Our previous research demonstrated that the existing subjective methodology of CI programming does not consistently produce optimal stimulation for speech perception, thereby limiting the potential for CI users to derive the maximum device benefit to achieve their peak potential. We demonstrated the benefit of utilising the objective method of measuring auditory-evoked cortical responses to speech stimuli as a reliable tool to guide and verify CI programming and, in turn, significantly improve speech perception performance. The present study was designed to investigate the impact of patient- and device-specific factors on the application of acoustically-evoked cortical auditory-evoked potential (aCAEP) measures as an objective clinical tool to verify CI mapping in adult CI users with bilateral deafness (BD). Methods: aCAEP responses were elicited using binaural peripheral auditory stimulation for four speech tokens (/m/, /g/, /t/, and /s/) and recorded by HEARLab™ software in adult BD CI users. Participants were classified into groups according to subjective or objective CI mapping procedures to elicit present aCAEP responses to all four speech tokens. The impact of patient- and device-specific factors on the presence of aCAEP responses and speech perception was investigated between participant groups. Results: Participants were categorised based on the presence or absence of the P1-N1-P2 aCAEP response to speech tokens. Out of the total cohort of adult CI users (n = 132), 63 participants demonstrated present responses pre-optimisation, 37 participants exhibited present responses post-optimisation, and the remaining 32 participants either showed an absent response for at least one speech token post-optimisation or did not accept the optimised CI map adjustments. Overall, no significant correlation was shown between patient and device-specific factors and the presence of aCAEP responses or speech perception scores. Conclusion: This study reinforces that aCAEP measures offer an objective, non-invasive approach to verify CI mapping, irrespective of patient or device factors. These findings further our understanding of the importance of personalised CI rehabilitation through CI mapping to minimise the degree of speech perception variation post-CI and allow all CI users to achieve maximum device benefit.

Valid Acoustic Models of Cochlear Implants: One Size Does Not Fit All.

Validation Of Acoustic Models Of Auditory Neural Prostheses

Central Auditory Processing of Temporal and Spectral-Variance Cues in Cochlear Implant Listeners

Channel-Vocoder-Centric Modelling of Cochlear Implants: Strengths and Limitations

Employing deep learning model to evaluate speech information in acoustic simulations of Cochlear implants

Comparable Encoding, Comparable Perceptual Pattern: Acoustic and Electric Hearing.

A Predictive Model for Cochlear Implant Outcome in Children with Cochlear Nerve Deficiency

Cochlear-implant Listeners Listening to Cochlear-implant Simulated Speech

A Guinea Pig Model Suggests That Objective Assessment of Acoustic Hearing Preservation in Human Ears With Cochlear Implants Is Confounded by Shifts in the Spatial Origin of Acoustically Evoked Potential Measurements Along the Cochlear Length

Establishment and Verification of Auditory Brainstem Implant Vocoder Model

Auditory Evoked Responses to Perceived Quality of Vocoded Speech

The Realization of Acoustic Model Based on Noise Modulating for Cochlear Implantation

How to vocode: Using channel vocoders for cochlear-implant research

DeepSpeech models show Human-like Performance and Processing of Cochlear Implant Inputs

Effects of Vocoder Processing on Speech Perception in Reverberant Classrooms.

Role of slow temporal modulations in speech identification for cochlear implant users

Pulsatile Gaussian-Enveloped Tones (GET) for Cochlear-Implant Simulation

Comparison of response properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve reported in human listeners and in animal models

Acoustic Change Responses to Amplitude Modulation in Cochlear Implant Users: Relationships to Speech Perception

The Impact of Patient Factors on Objective Cochlear Implant Verification Using Acoustic Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials

Behavioral Response Modeling to Resolve Listener- and Stimulus-Related Influences on Audiovisual Speech Integration in Cochlear Implant Users