Experiential key species for the nature‐disconnected generation
C. Battisti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12288
2016-12-01
Abstract:Worldwide, humans are increasingly seeking urban lifestyles (Turner, Nakamura & Dinetti, 2004) and the younger generations are developing digital-based behaviours that disconnect them further from nature (Mayer et al., 2009). This ‘ominous trend’ (Kareiva, 2008) can be the source of socialand individual-based pathological effects, still poorly investigated, and with humanity falling into the neologism of Nature Deficit Disorders (NDD; Levi & Kocher, 1999; Louv, 2005). Exposure to nature appears to increase human wellbeing, develop positive social attitudes to wildlife and biodiversity, and beneficial neurophysiological effects (Mayer et al., 2009). All these outcomes may be considered to be services provided by ecosystems, mainly for people living in towns and cities (Tzoulas et al., 2007). In urban areas (but, gradually, more and more in rural areas as well), new generations represent the target age group more likely to be affected by NDD. Indeed, in recent decades, children’s use of nature areas near their homes have substantially decreased and their activities changed from being spontaneous and self-initiated to being part of either planned or adult-controlled activities (Charles & Wheele, 2012). These changes may have strong effects on children’s identity formation (Sk ar & Krogh, 2009). Digital tools provide a vast amount of information, including that relating to the Nature. Thanks to the mass media and the Internet, we can assess and communicate the status of ecosystems at a global scale, and describe how to take action against threats to their existence. Nevertheless, alongside these positive and revolutionary aspects, an indoor lifestyle and the use of digital media lead to disengagement with the real world, particularly locally. This ‘digital distraction’ may induce a dangerous short-sightedness towards values and threats that are placed in the immediate neighbourhood of home. Moreover, the communication of exotic and charismatic nature over the media and Internet can induce complex behaviours in urban nature-deficient people, triggering resource consumption at the expense of local ‘km0-nature’, often neglected and forgotten (Palang et al., 2006). Paradoxically, the emphasis on a distant and virtual nature is perpetuated by some conservation NGOs that use charismatic species as flagships for fund-raising. It is surely important to engage with (and gain sympathy for) pandas, whales, elephants and other totemic species of conservation importance, but it is also strategically important to reconnect nature-deficient generations with their local biodiversity (Miller, 2005). In particular, a connection with local nature may develop Pro-Environmental Behaviours (PEB), increasing awareness of nature and potentially having an indirect positive effect on the natural environment (Steg & Vlek, 2009). Neglected and ‘km-0’ ecosystems can have a big role in the experiential growth of the digital generations. Stimulating experiences and familiarization with local nature induce a link with these environments, preventing a progressive degradation of the connection with nature as a result of ‘digital distraction’. These ‘Children of a Lesser God’ ecosystems (marginal areas, suburban rural contexts, etc.) contain a large set of species and communities, often in degraded condition (McKinney, 2008). Interestingly, a limited set of target taxa historically has always captured the attention of children, often through ritual and instinctive actions (hunting, gathering, farming) having beneficial long-term cognitive effects (Kaplan, 1993, 2001; Berto, 2005; Miller, 2005). These could be included in a new category of conservation-related species: the Experiential Key Species (EKS). Other than preventing Kareiva’s ‘ominous trend’, these species could play an important role in communicating ecological concepts and conservation issues (fragmentation, extinctions, metapopulations, synanthropy, adaptation, alien invasions) in realistic contexts (Gustavsson & Peterson, 2003). Using a conceptual causal chain approach, we can consider that EKS improve the experience, wellness and potentially PEB. In the remnant wetland that I manage, children are encouraged to collect and raise mullet (Mugil cephalus and Liza ramada) fry and toad (Bufo bufo) tadpoles with interesting outcomes: in a context where nature awareness is poor and threats are significant (Battisti et al., 2008), the use of EKS may represent a valuable conservation tool (community awareness raising; Salafsky et al., 2002).
Environmental Science,Psychology,Sociology