Abstract:Background and aims Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has been increasingly applied in the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors (G-SMTs) with explorative intention. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and clinical outcomes of EFTR and surgical intervention for the management of muscularis propria (MP)-derived G-SMTs. Methods Between September 2011 and May 2019, the clinical records of patients with MP-derived G-SMTs undergoing EFTR at our endoscopic unit were collected. A cohort of people with primary MP-derived G-SMTs treated by surgery was matched in a 1:1 ratio to EFTR group with regard to patients’ baseline characteristics, clinicopathologic features of the tumor and the procedure date. The perioperative outcomes and follow-up data were analyzed. Results In total, 62 and 62 patients were enrolled into the surgery and EFTR group, respectively, with median follow-up of 786 days. The size of G-SMTs (with ulceration) ranged from 10 to 90 mm. For patients with tumor smaller than 30 mm, surgery and EFTR group presented comparable procedural success rate (both were 100%), en bloc resection rate (100% vs. 94.7%), tumor capsule rupture rate (0% vs. 5.3%), and pathological R0 resection rate (both were 100%). EFTR had a statistically significant advantage over surgery for estimated blood loss (3.12 ± 5.20 vs. 46.97 ± 60.73 ml, p ≤ 0.001), discrepancy between the pre- and postprocedural hemoglobin level (5.18 ± 5.43 vs. 9.84 ± 8.25 g/L, p = 0.005), bowel function restoration [1 (0–5) vs. 3 (1–5) days, p ≤ 0.001], and hospital cost (28,617.09 ± 6720.78 vs. 33,963.10 ± 13,454.52 Yuan, p = 0.033). The patients with tumor larger than 30 mm showed roughly the same outcomes after comparison analysis of the two groups. However, the clinical data revealed lower en bloc resection rate (75.0% vs. 100%, p = 0.022) and higher tumor capsule rupture rate (25.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.022) for EFTR when compared to surgery. The procedure time, duration of postprocedural fasting and antibiotics usage, and hospital stay of the two groups were equivalent. The occurrence rate of adverse events within postoperative day 7 were 74.2% and 72.6% after EFTR and surgery, respectively ( p = 1.000). No complications occurred during the follow-up. Conclusion For treatment of MP-derived G-SMTs (with or without ulceration), our study showed the feasibility and safety of EFTR, which also provided better results in terms of procedural blood loss, the postoperative bowel function restoration and cost-effectiveness when compared to surgery, whereas the surgery was superior in en bloc resection rate for G-SMTs larger than 30 mm. The postprocedural clinical outcomes seemed to be equivalent in these two resection methods.

Comparison of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection and Cap-Assisted Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection in the Treatment of Small (≤1.5 Cm) Gastric GI Stromal Tumors

Resection of the Gastric Submucosal Tumor (G-SMT) Originating from the Muscularis Propria Layer: Comparison of Efficacy, Patients' Tolerability, and Clinical Outcomes Between Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection and Surgical Resection

Surgical Management and Outcomes of Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection of Small Bowel Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Retrospective Comparison of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Versus Laparoscopic or Surgical Resection of Small (≤ 5 cm) Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Comparison of endoscopic resection and gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Endoscopic Treatment Can Be a Viable Therapeutic Option for Esophageal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Endoscopic full-thickness resection for treating small tumors originating from the muscularis propria in the gastric fundus: An improvement in technique over 15 years

Comparison of Safety and Short‐term Outcomes Between Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Resections of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors with a Diameter of 2–5 Cm

Comparison of Safety and Outcomes between Endoscopic and Surgical Resections of Small (≤ 5 cm) Primary Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Comparison between endoscopic full-thickness resection and cap-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection in the treatment of elderly patients with small gastric stromal tumors

Laparoscopic resection is not superior to endoscopic resection for relative small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A propensity score-matched study

No-touch Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection Technique for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Laparoscopic Resection for Gastric Stromal Tumors with Sizes Larger Than 5 Cm

Laparoscopic Versus Open Wedge Resection for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Stomach: a Single-Center 8-Year Retrospective Cohort Study of 156 Patients with Long-Term Follow-Up

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal excavation and full-thickness resection for intraluminal gastric stromal tumors

Therapeutic value of endoscopic full-thickness resection for small gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the fundus of stomach

The Efficacy of Full-Thickness Endoscopic Resection of Subepithelial Tumors in the Gastric Cardia.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Usefulness of the thread-traction method in endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumor: a comparative study

Surgical Resection Is Still Better Than Endoscopic Resection for Patients With 2-5 cm Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis