Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the relationships between the location and extent of diffusion of free intraperitoneal air by multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) and between the location and size of acute gastrointestinal perforation. Methods: This was a descriptive case series. We examined abdominal CT images of 33 patients who were treated for intraoperatively confirmed gastrointestinal perforation (excluding appendiceal perforation) in the Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital between January and September 2022. We identified five locations of intraperitoneal air: the subphrenic space, hepatic portal space, mid-abdominal wall, mesenteric space, and pelvic cavity. We allocated the 33 patients to an upper gastrointestinal perforation (n=23) and lower gastrointestinal perforation group (n=10) base on intraoperative findings and analyzed the relationships between the locations of free gas and of gastrointestinal perforation. Additionally, we established two models for analyzing the extent of diffusion of free gas in the abdominal cavity and constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to analyze the relationships between the two models and the size of the gastrointestinal perforation. Results: In the upper gastrointestinal perforation group, free gas was located around the hepatic portal area in 91.3% (21/23) of patients: this is a significantly greater proportion than that found in the lower gastrointestinal perforation group (5/10) (P=0.016). In contrast, free gas was located in the mesenteric interspace in 8/10 patients in the lower gastrointestinal perforation group; this is a significantly greater proportion than was found in the upper gastrointestinal perforation group (8.7%, 2/23) (P<0.010). The sensitivity of diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal perforation base on the presence of hepatic portal free gas was 84.8% and the specificity 71.4%. Further, the sensitivity of diagnosis of lower gastrointestinal perforation base on the presence of mesenteric interspace free gas was 80.0% and the specificity 91.3%. The rates of presence of free gas in the subdiaphragmatic area, mid-abdominal wall, and pelvic cavity did not differ significantly between the two groups (all P>0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that when free gas was present in four or more of the studied locations in the abdominal cavity, the optimal cutoff for perforation diameter was 2 cm, the corresponding sensitivity 66.7%, and the specificity 100%, suggesting that abdominal free gas diffuses extensively when the diameter of the perforation is >2 cm. Another model revealed that when free gas is present in three or more of the studied locations, the optimal cutoff for perforation diameter is 1 cm, corresponding to a sensitivity of 91.7% and specificity of 76.2%; suggesting that free gas is relatively confined in the abdominal cavity when the diameter of the perforation is <1 cm. Conclusion: Identifying which of five locations in the abdominal cavity contains free intraperitoneal air by examining MSCT images can be used to assist in the diagnosis of the location and size of acute gastrointestinal perforations.

Diagnosis of Upper Gastrointestinal Perforation Complicated with Fistula Formation and Subphrenic Abscess by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Case Report

Images for diagnosis A jejunopericardial fistula 14 years after surgery for gastric cancer

Diagnosis of Pediatric Appendicovesical Fistula by Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound: A Case Report

Intracavitary Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Management of Post-Surgical Gastrointestinal Fistulas

Values of Non-Vascular Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Guiding Percutaneous Drainage of Upper Gastrointestinal Fistulas

Value of Intracavitary Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Via Abdomen in Fistulas Difficult to Diagnose Before Operation

A New Diagnosis Standard for Enterovesical Fistula in Crohn's Disease by Intracavitary Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Intracavitary Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography to Detect Enterovesical Fistula in Crohn's Disease.

Gastrocolic fistula in Crohn's disease detected by oral agent contrast-enhanced ultrasound: A case report of a novel ultrasound modality

Ultrasonic Diagnosis of Congenital Enterocolitis Fistula: A Case Report

Ultrasound examination in the diagnosis of digestive tract perforation

Value of Intracavitary Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Fistulas

[Diagnostic Value of Identifying Location and Amount of Free Gas in the Abdominal Cavity by Multidetector Computed Tomography in Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Perforation].

P305 Intra-cavitary Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Novel Radiation-Free Method to Detect Abscess Associated Internal Fistulas in Crohn’s Disease

Sonographic and CT Imaging Features of Intestinal Perforation from a Pill and Packing

Value of enhanced MSCT in the diagnosis of gallbladder perforation

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Evaluation of Hemoperitoneum in Patients With Cirrhosis

Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Percutaneous Fistula Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Transrectal 360° 3-D Imaging and Conventional Transrectal Ultrasound in Complex Anal Fistula

Value of CT in Early Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Perforation

Cholecystoduodenal fistula: ultrasonographic diagnosis with oral gastrointestinal ultrasound contrast medium

[Computed tomography in the study of gastrointestinal perforation]