Opportunities and Challenges Related to Saturation of Toxicokinetic Processes: Implications for Risk Assessment

Yu-Mei Tan,Hugh A. Barton,Alan Boobis,Rachel Brunner,Harvey Clewell,Rhian Cope,Jeffrey Dawson,Jeanne Domoradzki,Peter Egeghy,Pankaj Gulati,Brandall Ingle,Nicole Kleinstreuer,Kelly Lowe,Anna Lowit,Elizabeth Mendez,David Miller,Jeffrey Minucci,James Nguyen,Alicia Paini,Monique Perron,Katherine Phillips,Hua Qian,Tharacad Ramanarayanan,Fiona Sewell,Philip Villanueva,John Wambaugh,Michelle Embry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105070
IF: 3.598
2021-01-01
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Abstract:Top dose selection for repeated dose animal studies has generally focused on identification of apical endpoints, use of the limit dose, or determination of a maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The intent is to optimize the ability of toxicity tests performed in a small number of animals to detect effects for hazard identification. An alternative approach, the kinetically derived maximum dose (KMD), has been proposed as a mechanism to integrate toxicokinetic (TK) data into the dose selection process. The approach refers to the dose above which the systemic exposures depart from being proportional to external doses. This non-linear external-internal dose relationship arises from saturation or limitation of TK process(es), such as absorption or metabolism. The importance of TK information is widely acknowledged when assessing human health risks arising from exposures to environmental chemicals, as TK determines the amount of chemical at potential sites of toxicological responses. However, there have been differing opinions and interpretations within the scientific and regulatory communities related to the validity and application of the KMD concept. A multi-stakeholder working group, led by the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI), was formed to provide an opportunity for impacted stakeholders to address commonly raised scientific and technical issues related to this topic and, more specifically, a weight of evidence approach is recommended to inform design and dose selection for repeated dose animal studies. Commonly raised challenges related to the use of TK data for dose selection are discussed, recommendations are provided, and illustrative case examples are provided to address these challenges or refute misconceptions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?