Environmental Science and Research in China: a Snapshot of the Current State.
Eddy Y. Zeng,Shu Tao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1897/07-475.1
2007-01-01
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Abstract:This special issue, “Environmental Science and Research in China,” marks the first time in the history of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) that an entire issue is dedicated to documenting the results of environmental research conducted mostly by Chinese scientists residing in China. We feel extremely honored to have the opportunity to introduce the issue to the readers of ET&C. We particularly applaud the staff of the Editorial Office of ET&C and the Editors who have been involved in the peer review process, as the publication of this issue would have been impossible without their tremendous efforts. This special issue is being published at an opportune time because China is dealing with numerous challenges to sustain ongoing economic expansion while attempting to develop effective measures to protect the environment. Since the enforcement of the new economic reform in the early 1980s, China's economy has grown at a rate unmatched by any other country. The gross domestic production (GDP) has increased from Ren Min Bi (RMB) 450 billion ($1∼7.5 RMB) in 1980, often considered the first year that economic reform was initiated in China, to RMB 20,941 billion in 2006 (Fig. 1a), representing an annual rate increase of 9.6% on a comparable cost basis. By 2005, the Chinese economic aggregate ranked fourth in the world, just behind the United States, Japan, and Germany [1]. It should be noted, however, that economic growth in China has been achieved with excessive energy consumption and inefficient use of resources in many cases, as compared to other nations. For example, the energy consumption per capita GDP in China is 4.3, 7.7, and 11.5 times those in the United States, Germany, and Japan, respectively. In addition, lack of effective measures often has resulted in severe pollution of the nation's natural eco-environments. A news story by the Xinhua Agency, the Chinese government's official news agency, on December 5, 2006, revealed that 46.5% of the country's approximately 700 rivers and more than 90% of the country's urban aquatic systems were considered contaminated at various levels [2]. Recognizing the urgency to contain and/or reduce pollution stemming from explosive economic growth, the Chinese government has steadily increased spending for research and technological improvements to enhance the country's ability to lower energy consumption for per capita GDP and better protect the environment. The total governmental investment in environmental research and technological improvements increased from RMB 47.6 billion during the fiscal years of 1986 to 1990 to more than RMB 700 billion for 2001 to 2005 and is predicted to reach RMB 1,375 billion from 2006 to 2010 (Fig. 2), accounting for 1.6% of the nation's GDP (http://www.zhb.gov.cn/ztbd/jzhjlt/tpbd/200510/t20051028.71107.htm). Similar to this trend, the total national budget for research and development also increased substantially from RMB 33 billion in 1996 to RMB 294 billion in 2006 (http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/). Accompanying the increased investment in research has been a steady rise in the number of scientific publications solely authored or coauthored by Chinese researchers (Fig. 1b). This rise directly correlates with the increase of China's GDP over the period of 1980 to 2006 (Fig. 1), emphasizing the positive impact of the nation's increasing economic power (and associated investments in science and technology) on the nation's scientific research output. Although no exact figure related to environmental research can be determined, a similar trend is expected. As witness to China's determination to address environmental issues with international collaborators, Peking University and the Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry successfully hosted the SETAC Asia/Pacific 2006 Annual Meeting, September 18 to 20, 2006, in Beijing. This was the first SETAC conference held in China, and it was well attended by more than 200 environmental scientists and engineers from 27 countries and regions, in addition to those from China. China's environmental issues also have drawn growing attention from the international community, largely thanks to the ever-increasing importance of China's position in international commerce. After all, pollutants do not stay where they are generated. Many toxic chemical substances are known to have the potential for long-range transport, and globalization adds another dimension for exchange of contaminants between trading partners. It is not surprising that Environmental Science & Technology recently published a series of news stories (along with related research papers) on the occurrence of persistent halogenated hydrocarbons in consumer fish [3], birds of prey [4], soil [5], and air [6] near an e-waste recycling site and in workers dismantling e-waste [7]. The alarming levels of contamination in most samples under investigation pointed to the need to continue monitoring the state of the environment in China and in particular to look for ways to enhance the country's ability to reduce point source discharge and mitigate any potential adverse effects. The papers contained in this special issue are by no means the ultimate solution to China's environmental problems; however, collectively they do offer a glimpse into the current state of Chinese eco-environments, as well as a snapshot of the environmental research activities conducted by Chinese scientists and their international colleagues. Thirty-four research papers are included in this special issue that involve 152 researchers, among which 127 are from mainland China, 10 from China's Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, and 15 from other countries (only the first institution is counted if an author is affiliated with multiple institutions). These authors represent 23, three, and 10 institutions in mainland China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, and other countries, respectively. If classified by the corresponding authors' institutions, which largely is reflective of where the research work was conducted, the majority of the papers were contributed from four geographic regions. In North China, five institutions contributing 15 papers are located in Beijing, Tianjin, and Dalian. The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences and Peking University located in Beijing contributed six and four papers, respectively. The remaining papers are authored by researchers from Nankai University (3) based in Tianjin; Dalian Maritime University (1) based in Dalian, Liaoning Province; and Beijing Normal University (1). In South China, including Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a total of 10 papers are contributed from four institutions. The Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry located in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, contributed the largest number of papers (6), followed by the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (2), the University of Hong Kong (1), and Jinan University (1) located in Guangzhou. In East China, Zhejiang University of Technology (Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province), the Institute of Soil Science (Nanjing), and Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Shanghai) contributed two, one, and one papers, respectively. In Central China, the Institute of Hydrobiology (3) and the Huazhong Agricultural University (1), both based in Wuhan of Hubei Province, are sole contributors to the special issue. Finally, one paper was contributed from the Institute of Geochemistry, a sole contributor from Southwest China. The distribution pattern of the corresponding authors' institutions clearly indicates that large urban centers have remained the dominant forces driving environmental research activities in China. This is not unexpected, as large cities in China traditionally have been better developed economically than midsize and small towns and therefore have the resources to fund research programs or are better positioned to deal with environmental issues. This is also why there is a high correlation between China's GDP and the number of publications authored by Chinese researchers (Fig. 1). The papers included in this special issue roughly can be categorized into four subject areas: Occurrence of legacy and emerging chemicals (numbers 1–13), environmental processes (numbers 14–20), estrogenicity and ecotoxicity (numbers 21–32), and development of quality standards (numbers 33–34). The papers addressing the occurrence of legacy and emerging chemicals and some references cited in these papers are good indicators of the state of contamination in China, although the issues revealed in these papers are only the tip of the iceberg of the contamination challenges facing China. They also somewhat illustrate the categories of contaminants and regional environmental issues of greatest focus by Chinese scientists. Consistent with the extent of economic development and urbanization, the Pearl River Delta, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Bohai Bay area, located along the coasts of southern, eastern, and northern China respectively, have been under more intensive investigations than other regions of China. Environmental processes, including sorption/desorption, bioaccumulation, and biotransformation, that critically govern the bioavailability of soil/sediment-bound chemicals, have been investigated quite extensively by researchers around the world to understand the environmental fate of toxic chemical substances. The seven papers under environmental processes demonstrate the increased interest of Chinese scholars in this research area. The papers in the area of estrogenicity and eco-toxicity are reflective of continuing efforts and recent progress made by Chinese researchers to examine the environmental effects of toxic chemical substances. China traditionally has trailed developed countries in this research area, and the relatively large number of papers in this category is an indication that Chinese environmental scientists are attempting to catch up. One of the objectives of many environmental research programs is to develop quality standards that can be used to guide decision-making processes. Conversely, development of appropriate quality standards largely relies on quality research results. China has long lacked reliable assessment standards that allow it to determine objectively the state of the environment. Although only two papers are under development of quality standards, they nevertheless represent an important step in the right direction. We hope the readers of ET&C find this special issue informative and enjoyable. We also hope that the inauguration of this special issue will encourage more collaboration between Chinese environmental scientists and their global counterparts. Changes of (a) China's gross domestic production (GDP) in Chinese currency, Ren Min Bi (RMB) [8], and (b) number of publications solely authored or coauthored by Chinese Scientists (as tracked by Web of Science of Thomson Corporation) from 1980 to 2006. Governmental investments (in Chinese currency, Ren Min Bi [RMB]) in research and technological improvements associated with environmental protection; the number for 2006 to 2010 is a projection; http://www.zhb.gov.cn/ztbd/jzhjlt/tpbd/200510/t20051028_71107.htm).