Divergent Selection of KNR6 Maximizes Grain Production by Balancing the Flowering‐time Adaptation and Ear Size in Maize
Weiya Li,Haitao Jia,Manfei Li,Yiqin Huang,Wenkang Chen,Pengfei Yin,Zhixing Yang,Qiuyue Chen,Feng Tian,Zuxin Zhang,Xiaohong Yang,Lei Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.14050
IF: 13.8
2023-01-01
Plant Biotechnology Journal
Abstract:Plant Biotechnology JournalEarly View Brief CommunicationOpen Access Divergent selection of KNR6 maximizes grain production by balancing the flowering-time adaptation and ear size in maize Weiya Li, Weiya Li orcid.org/0000-0002-6106-8530 State Key Laboratory of Plant Environmental Resilience and National Maize Improvement Center of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorHaitao Jia, Haitao Jia orcid.org/0000-0003-1409-6288 National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China Food Crops Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Science, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, China These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorManfei Li, Manfei Li orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-183X National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYiqin Huang, Yiqin Huang Food Crops Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Science, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorWenkang Chen, Wenkang Chen orcid.org/0000-0001-7326-2595 State Key Laboratory of Plant Environmental Resilience and National Maize Improvement Center of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorPengfei Yin, Pengfei Yin orcid.org/0000-0002-7556-9635 State Key Laboratory of Plant Environmental Resilience and National Maize Improvement Center of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZhixing Yang, Zhixing Yang State Key Laboratory of Plant Environmental Resilience and National Maize Improvement Center of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorQiuyue Chen, Qiuyue Chen orcid.org/0000-0002-3304-8321 Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USASearch for more papers by this authorFeng Tian, Feng Tian orcid.org/0000-0003-3552-4536 State Key Laboratory of Plant Environmental Resilience and National Maize Improvement Center of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZuxin Zhang, Zuxin Zhang orcid.org/0000-0001-8697-1681 National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorXiaohong Yang, Corresponding Author Xiaohong Yang [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-6438-948X State Key Laboratory of Plant Environmental Resilience and National Maize Improvement Center of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaCorrespondence (Tel +86-027-87282689; fax +86-027-87384670; email [email protected] (L.L.) and Tel/fax +86-010-62732400; email [email protected] (X.Y.))Search for more papers by this authorLei Liu, Corresponding Author Lei Liu [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-5095-7244 National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, ChinaCorrespondence (Tel +86-027-87282689; fax +86-027-87384670; email [email protected] (L.L.) and Tel/fax +86-010-62732400; email [email protected] (X.Y.))Search for more papers by this author Weiya Li, Weiya Li orcid.org/0000-0002-6106-8530 State Key Laboratory of Plant Environmental Resilience and National Maize Improvement Center of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorHaitao Jia, Haitao Jia orcid.org/0000-0003-1409-6288 National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China Food Crops Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Science, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, China These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorManfei Li, Manfei Li orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-183X National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYiqin Huang, Yiqin Huang Food Crops Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Science, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorWenkang Chen, Wenkang Chen orcid.org/0000-0001-7326-2595 State Key Laboratory of Plant Environmental Resilience and National Maize Improvement Center of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorPengfei Yin, Pengfei Yin orcid.org/0000-0002-7556-9635 State Key Laboratory of Plant Environmental Resilience and National Maize Improvement Center of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZhixing Yang, Zhixing Yang State Key Laboratory of Plant Environmental Resilience and National Maize Improvement Center of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorQiuyue Chen, Qiuyue Chen orcid.org/0000-0002-3304-8321 Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USASearch for more papers by this authorFeng Tian, Feng Tian orcid.org/0000-0003-3552-4536 State Key Laboratory of Plant Environmental Resilience and National Maize Improvement Center of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZuxin Zhang, Zuxin Zhang orcid.org/0000-0001-8697-1681 National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorXiaohong Yang, Corresponding Author Xiaohong Yang [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-6438-948X State Key Laboratory of Plant Environmental Resilience and National Maize Improvement Center of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaCorrespondence (Tel +86-027-87282689; fax +86-027-87384670; email [email protected] (L.L.) and Tel/fax +86-010-62732400; email [email protected] (X.Y.))Search for more papers by this authorLei Liu, Corresponding Author Lei Liu [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-5095-7244 National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, ChinaCorrespondence (Tel +86-027-87282689; fax +86-027-87384670; email [email protected] (L.L.) and Tel/fax +86-010-62732400; email [email protected] (X.Y.))Search for more papers by this author First published: 16 April 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.14050 AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Domestication and improvement have led to dramatic changes in the plant architecture and inflorescence in maize. These transformations were achieved by selecting desirable alleles for target traits to meet human needs and local environment adaptation, such as grain yield and flowering time (Doebley et al., 2006). Indeed, the selection of KRN2 and KRN4 genes contributed to the enlargement of ear size and the selection of ZCN8, ZmCCT9 and ZmCCT10 genes promoted the expansion of maize from tropical to temperate regions by accelerating flowering (Chen et al., 2022; Guo et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2015). Our previous study revealed that the KERNEL NUMBER PER ROW6 (KNR6) gene regulated ear size variations (Jia et al., 2020). The alleles with insertions of two linked transposable elements (TEs) in the promoter and 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) suppressed the expression of KNR6 and decreased ear size, indicating that the TE-insertion allele was undesirable for ear size. Phenotyping of two independent RNA-interference (RNAi) lines and two overexpression (OE) lines showed earlier flowering in the KNR6RNAi lines (average 2.3–3.4 days earlier in days-to-tasseling (DTT) and days-to-silking (DTS) (Figure 1a,c,d) and later flowering in KNR6-OE lines (average 1.8–3.7 days later in DTT and DTS) than in the non-transgenic lines (Figure 1b,e,f). We next found that the near-isogenic line (NIL) with TE-insertion allele promoted flowering by 1.6 days in DTT and 1.5 days in DTS compared with the NIL without TE-insertion allele (Figure 1g,h). The marker–trait association showed the presence/absence variation (PAV) of TE in 5′UTR rather than the structural variation around the TE in the promoter was significantly associated with flowering time (Figure S1), and hereafter, the alleles with and without 5′UTR-TE were referred to the KNR6TE+ and KNR6TE- alleles, respectively. Subsequently, we tested the allelic effects in a Chinese widely grown maize hybrid, Zheng58 (ZH58)/Chang7-2 (C7-2). When the KNR6TE+ allele was substituted by the KNR6TE− allele, the improved hybrids with heterozygous alleles (ZH58/iC7-2, iZH58/C7-2) or homozygous KNR6TE− alleles (iZH58/iC7-2) showed 1.9–3.8 days later in flowering time than the original ZH58/C7-2 hybrid (Figure 1i,j), but a 3.3%–5.6% increase in grain yield production (Figure 5a–g of Jia et al., 2020). These findings indicate that KNR6 affects both ear size and flowering time, and the long-ear KNR6TE− allele shows a delayed flowering time. Thus, managing the KNR6 trade-off between flowering time and grain yield would be an efficient way to breed elite lines with high grain yield and appropriate flowering time. Figure 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint KNR6 was targeted by selection and contributed to the flowering-time adaptation. (a–f) Knocking down KNR6 promoted flowering (a, c,d), and overexpressing KNR6 delayed flowering time (b, e,f). (g,h) NILqknr6 with TE-insertion allele accelerated flowering compared to NILqKNR6 without TE-insertion allele. (i–j) Comparisons of flowering time in improved ZH58/C7-2 hybrids. iC7-2, improved line C7-2 with KNR6TE− allele; iZH58, improved line ZH58 with KNR6TE− allele. (k) The KNR6TE+ and KNR6TE− allele frequency in teosintes, tropical/subtropical and temperate maize inbreds. (l) Nucleotide diversity of the region surrounding the 5′UTR-TE PAV in maize and teosinte. πM/πT indicates that the amount of nucleotide diversity (π) retained in maize relative to that in teosinte. **Significance was tested using a coalescent simulation test, P < 0.01. (m) Geographical distribution of the KNR6TE+/KNR6TE− allele in 470 maize landraces native to America and the latitude variations among different allelic groups. (n) The KNR6TE+/KNR6TE− allele frequency in a set of diverse maize inbreds. (o) The transmission pathways of the KNR6TE+ allele in two Chinese germplasms and a proposed strategy for managing a trade-off between flowering time and ear size with KNR6 and other flowering genes. In (c–j), the data represent the mean ± sd. Significance was tested using a Student's t-test in c–h, and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison tests that different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 in i,j. We next genotyped the 5'UTR-TE PAV in 189 teosinte accessions, 275 tropical/subtropical and 357 temperate maize inbreds (Data S1). The KNR6TE+ allele was not found in teosintes and its frequency in tropical/subtropical and temperate germplasms was 2.4% and 18.5% respectively (Figure 1k). Nucleotide diversity analysis in teosintes (n = 43) and maize inbreds (n = 275) showed a strong selection signal in the surrounding region of the 5′UTR-TE PAV (Figure 1l). Both KNR6TE+ and KNR6TE− alleles retained only 3.8% and 13.0% of the nucleotide diversity from teosinte to maize, respectively (Figure 1l), indicating both alleles were selected during maize evolution. Additionally, the KNR6TE+ frequency in temperate inbreds was higher than that in tropical/subtropical inbreds, indicating that the KNR6TE+ allele might contribute to maize adaptation to temperate regions. Similar results were observed by the geographical distribution of the KNR6TE+/KNR6TE− alleles in 470 landraces, showing that landraces with KNR6TE+ allele were primarily located in the northern United States with high latitudes (Figure 1m), suggesting that the KNR6TE+ allele might be positively selected to promote the adaptation of maize to high latitudes by accelerating flowering. However, the lower frequency of the KNR6TE+ allele in the modern inbreds (Figure 1n) indicates that it was negatively selected during maize improvement due to its negative effect on grain yield. The duration of the crop life cycle is often restricted by the local farming system. For example, the conventional double-cropped winter wheat–summer maize system in the Chinese Huanghuaihai region requires early flowering for maize in summer to facilitate wheat cultivation immediately after maize harvesting. Geographical distribution of the KNR6TE+/KNR6TE− alleles in maize inbreds showed that the KNR6TE+ allele was more enriched in Chinese lines (18.5%) than in the lines from Latin America (3.6%) and America (10.9%) in modern maize (Figure 1n). Interestingly, 70.7% (29/41) of Chinese lines harbouring KNR6TE+ allele distributed in the Huanghuaihai region (Figure S2), where short life cycle maize is in high demand. Notably, the KNR6TE+ allele frequency was high in proprietary germplasms that derived from the American maize hybrid 3382 (52.5%) and the Chinese landrace TangSiPingTou (55.6%) (Figure 1o), which are two of the most widely used germplasms in the current breeding programmes in China. Thus, optimizing the flowering time to adapt to the local environment would be an effective way to maximize maize production (Parent et al., 2018). Finally, we estimated the effects of KNR6 and four known flowering genes, ZmCCT9, ZmCCT10, VGT1 and ZCN8, on flowering time and ear length in a diverse maize population containing 508 maize inbreds. As expected, all genes had strong effects on flowering time, and only KNR6 had a trade-off effect on ear length (Figure S3). Notably, the early-flowering allele of VGT1 still promoted flowering by 2.1 days when the early flowering alleles of ZmCCT9 and ZmCCT10 were fixed in the lines with long-ear/late-flowering KNR6TE− allele of KNR6 (Figure S4). Moreover, the early-flowering alleles of VGT1, ZmCCT9 and ZmCCT10 were not fixed in modern inbreds (Figure S5). Thus, we proposed an operational strategy, as shown in two aforementioned Chinese germplasms, to improve grain yield of the lines by replacing the short-ear/early-flowering KNR6TE+ allele with the long-ear/late-flowering KNR6TE− allele of KNR6 and balancing the late-flowering effect by pyramiding the early-flowering alleles of ZmCCT9, ZmCCT10, VGT1 and other flowering-time genes via marker-assisted selection (Figure 1o). Collectively, we found that KNR6 underwent divergent selection during maize breeding to extend adaptation and increase grain yield, and offered a knowledge-driven strategy for engineering KNR6 to maximize maize grain production. Acknowledgements This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31901558, 32225036) and the Chinese Universities Scientific Fund (2022TC077). Author contributions W.L, H.J., Z.Z., X.Y. and L.L. designed research. W.L, H.J., M.L., Y.H., W.C., P.Y., Z.Y. and Q.C. performed the experiment and analysed the data. W.L., H.J., X.Y. and L.L. wrote the paper. F.T. and Z.Z. revised it. All the authors read and approved the paper. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Supporting Information Filename Description pbi14050-sup-0001-AppendixS1.pdfPDF document, 765.7 KB Appendix S1 Methods. pbi14050-sup-0002-DataS1.xlsxExcel 2007 spreadsheet , 81.1 KB Data S1 List of teosinte accessions, maize landraces and inbred lines used in this study. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. References Chen, W., Chen, L., Zhang, X., Yang, N., Guo, J., Wang, M., Ji, S. et al. (2022) Convergent selection of a WD40 protein that enhances grain yield in maize and rice. Science 375, eabg7985. Doebley, J.F., Gaut, B.S. and Smith, B.D. (2006) The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127, 1309– 1321. Guo, L., Wang, X., Zhao, M., Huang, C., Li, C., Li, D., Yang, C.J. et al. (2018) Stepwise cis-regulatory changes in ZCN8 contribute to maize flowering-time adaptation. Curr. Biol. 28, 3005– 3015. Jia, H., Li, M., Li, W., Liu, L., Jian, Y., Yang, Z., Shen, X. et al. (2020) A serine/threonine protein kinase encoding gene KERNEL NUMBER PER ROW6 regulates maize grain yield. Nat. Commun. 11, 1– 11. Liu, L., Du, Y., Shen, X., Li, M., Sun, W., Huang, J., Liu, Z. et al. (2015) KRN4 controls quantitative variation in maize kernel row number. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005670. Parent, B., Leclere, M., Lacube, S., Semenov, M.A., Welcker, C., Martre, P. and Tardieu, F. (2018) Maize yields over Europe may increase in spite of climate change, with an appropriate use of the genetic variability of flowering time. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 10642– 10647. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation