Abstract:Background: Violent attacks on and interferences with hospitals, ambulances, health workers, and patients during conflict destroy vital health services during a time when they are most needed and undermine the long-term capacity of the health system. In Syria, such attacks have been frequent and intense and represent grave violations of the Geneva Conventions, but the number reported has varied considerably. A systematic mechanism to document these attacks could assist in designing more protection strategies and play a critical role in influencing policy, promoting justice, and addressing the health needs of the population. Methods and findings: We developed a mobile data collection questionnaire to collect data on incidents of attacks on healthcare directly from the field. Data collectors from the Syrian American Medical Society (SAMS), using the tool or a text messaging system, recorded information on incidents across four of Syria's northern governorates (Aleppo, Idleb, Hama, and Homs) from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016. SAMS recorded a total of 200 attacks on healthcare in 2016, 102 of them using the mobile data collection tool. Direct attacks on health facilities comprised the majority of attacks recorded (88.0%; n = 176). One hundred and twelve healthcare staff and 185 patients were killed in these incidents. Thirty-five percent of the facilities were attacked more than once over the data collection period; hospitals were significantly more likely to be attacked more than once compared to clinics and other types of healthcare facilities. Aerial bombs were used in the overwhelming majority of cases (91.5%). We also compared the SAMS data to a separate database developed by Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) based on media reports and matched the incidents to compare the results from the two methods (this analysis was limited to incidents at health facilities). Among 90 relevant incidents verified by PHR and 177 by SAMS, there were 60 that could be matched to each other, highlighting the differences in results from the two methods. This study is limited by the complexities of data collection in a conflict setting, only partial use of the standardized reporting tool, and the fact that limited accessibility of some health facilities and workers and may be biased towards the reporting of attacks on larger or more visible health facilities. Conclusions: The use of field data collectors and use of consistent definitions can play an important role in the tracking incidents of attacks on health services. A mobile systematic data collection tool can complement other methods for tracking incidents of attacks on healthcare and ensure the collection of detailed information about each attack that may assist in better advocacy, programs, and accountability but can be practically challenging. Comparing attacks between SAMS and PHR suggests that there may have been significantly more attacks than previously captured by any one methodology. This scale of attacks suggests that targeting of healthcare in Syria is systematic and highlights the failure of condemnation by the international community and medical groups working in Syria of such attacks to stop them.

Health information management systems and practices in conflict-affected settings: the case of northwest Syria

Responding to health needs of women, children and adolescents within Syria during conflict: intervention coverage, challenges and adaptations

Infection prevention and control in conflict-affected areas in northeast Syria: A cross-sectional study

Assessment of the health needs of Syrian refugees in Lebanon and Syria’s neighboring countries

Challenges of providing healthcare worker education and training in protracted conflict: a focus on non-government controlled areas in north west Syria

Determining the scope of attacks on health in four governorates of Syria in 2016: Results of a field surveillance program

Antimicrobial resistance in the context of the Syrian conflict: Drivers before and after the onset of conflict and key recommendations

Vaccination governance in protracted conflict settings: the case of northwest Syria

Quantifying the effects of attacks on health facilities on health service use in Northwest Syria: a case time series study from 2017 to 2019

Opportunities and challenges of using a health information system in adolescent health management: A qualitative study of healthcare providers' perspectives in the West Bank, occupied Palestinian territory

Capturing sources of health system legitimacy in fragmented conflict zones under different governance models: a case study of northwest Syria

Achieving integrated disease surveillance in the Eastern Mediterranean Region

[Managing routine health information system data during a security crisis in the health district of Timbuktu, Mali in 2023]

Barriers faced by primary healthcare providers in addressing emergencies in the Northern region of Palestine before and during the Gaza war

Impact of conflict on maternal and child health service delivery - how and how not: a country case study of conflict affected areas of Pakistan

Respiratory health and the Syrian conflict: a scoping literature review

Measles in conflict-affected northern Syria: results from an ongoing outbreak surveillance program

A framework for community health worker optimisation in conflict settings: prerequisites and possibilities from Northwest Syria

Learning interventions in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean region: supporting Member States to get prepared for better response to health emergencies in the region

Factors affecting the quality of working life among nurses caring for Syrian refugee camps in Jordan

Assessing the integration of refugee health data into national health information systems in Jordan, Lebanon, and Uganda