Married status affects rates of treatment and mortality in male and female renal cell carcinoma patients across all stages
Carolin Siech,Simone Morra,Lukas Scheipner,Andrea Baudo,Letizia M.I. Jannello,Mario de Angelis,Jordan A. Goyal,Zhe Tian,Fred Saad,Shahrokh F. Shariat,Nicola Longo,Luca Carmignani,Ottavio De Cobelli,Sascha Ahyai,Alberto Briganti,Philipp Mandel,Luis A. Kluth,Felix K.H. Chun,Pierre I. Karakiewicz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2024.01.016
IF: 3.121
2024-02-03
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
Abstract:Introduction The association between treatment rates and cancer specific mortality (CSM) according to married status in male and female clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients across all stages is unknown. Patient and Methods Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), ccRCC patients were stratified according to married status (married vs. unmarried). Logistic regression models addressed treatment rates; Cox regression models addressed CSM rates. Results Of 98,142 patients, 43,999 (72%) males and 20,287 (55%) females were married. In stage-specific analyses, married status independently predicted higher nephrectomy rates in males and females (all p≤0.03). In stage IV, married status predicted higher systemic therapy rate in males (p<0.001), but not in females. In survival analyses, married males exhibited lower CSM rates relative to unmarried males (all p≤0.02). Conversely, married females exhibited lower CSM rates only in stages I and III (all p≤0.02), but not in stages II and IV. In subgroup analyses of T1aN0M0 patients, married status was associated with higher partial nephrectomy rates in both males and females (all p≤0.005). Conclusion In ccRCC, married status invariably predicts higher rates of guideline recommended surgical management (nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy). Moreover, even after adjustment for treatment type, married status independently predicted lower CSM rates in males across all stages. However, the effect of married status in females is only operational in stages I and III. Lack of association between married status in stages II and IV may potentially be explained by stronger association with treatment assignment which reduces the residual effect on survival. Macro abstract In stage-specific analyses of 98,142 renal cell carcinoma patients, married status independently predicted higher nephrectomy rates in males and females. In stage IV, married status predicted higher systemic therapy rate in males, but not in females. Married males exhibited lower cancer specific mortality across all stages; married females only in stages I and III (all p≤0.02).
oncology,urology & nephrology