Abstract:Abstract Psychosocial work conditions can be detrimental to worker wellbeing with 70% of healthcare workers reporting work related stress, which may lead to burnout. Despite European health and safety legislation, managers rarely assess and manage workplace psychosocial risks. The Public Health workforce in Ireland, already impacted by the pandemic, is currently experiencing major organisational change as a result of the ongoing Public Health Reform Process. This paper describes the structures, processes and outcomes involved in a Public Health staff (n = 56) workplace psychosocial risk assessment, guided by the European Framework for Psychosocial risk Management: PRIMA-EF, using the HSE Work Positive CI psychosocial risk assessment survey. The establishment of a multidisciplinary Health & Wellbeing (H&W) group, under the governance of the Area Senior Management Team, was key to guide the process, including a workplace health promotion initiative, influenced by Positive Psychology framework (PERMA). The response rate to the survey was 70% (n = 40), with half of staff reporting psychological distress. Work stressors included role clarity, demand, change and control, scoring below average compared to Irish organisational norms. Relationships and manager support scored highly. The H&W group shared results promptly with all staff and formulated iterative mitigation measures, including HSE Change Management and HSE Health & Wellbeing consultants, based on the survey action plan and staff feedback. Five months later a repeat survey revealed continuing issues around role clarity and demands, with change and control showing an improvement. Further exploration of these results, and an evaluation, informed by staff feedback is ongoing and iterative. Lessons learnt include the importance of embedding a dedicated H&W multidisciplinary group to lead the continuous process; senior management support; employee involvement and effective utilisation of existing organisational tools and supports. Key messages • It is a public health imperative to promote risk assessment and mitigation of healthcare workplace stressors to safeguard employee wellbeing and ensure health service resilience and patient safety. • Effective workplace psychosocial risk assessment and implementation of targeted mitigation measures requires management support and a continuous iterative collaborative quality improvement process.

Person-centred care and the work-related health and job satisfaction of health and social care professionals: protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study combined with qualitative studies (the PCC@Work project)

Associations between person-centred care and job strain, stress of conscience, and intent to leave among hospital personnel

Regional public health staff workplace psychosocial risk assessment and health promotion initiative

Protocol for the Swiss COhort of Healthcare Professionals and Informal CAregivers (SCOHPICA): Professional trajectories, intention to stay in or leave the job and well-being of healthcare professionals

Person-centred care by a combined digital platform and structured telephone support for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and/or chronic heart failure: study protocol for the PROTECT randomised controlled trial

Developing a global practice-based framework of person-centred care from primary data: a cross-national qualitative study with patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals

Investigating healthcare workforce recruitment and retention: a mixed-methods study protocol

Person-centred eHealth intervention for patients on sick leave due to common mental disorders: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial and process evaluation (PROMISE)

Evaluating Implementation and Outcomes of a Person-Centered Care Model for People with Dementia in the Rehabilitation In-Patient Setting: Project Protocol

Effects of adding early cooperation and a work-place dialogue meeting to primary care management for sick-listed patients with stress-related disorders: CO-WORK-CARE-Stress – a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

Post-COVID in healthcare workers and its consequences on quality of life, activities, participation, need for rehabilitation and care experiences: protocol of a cohort study

Health Workforce Challenges: Key Findings From the Swiss Cohort of Healthcare Professionals and Informal Caregivers (SCOHPICA)

Care Under Pressure 2: a realist synthesis of causes and interventions to mitigate psychological ill health in nurses, midwives and paramedics

Study Protocol for a Participatory Action Research Study

Exploring person-centred care in relation to resource utilization, resident quality of life and staff job strain – findings from the SWENIS study

Team social cohesion, professionalism, and patient-centeredness: Gendered care work, with special reference to elderly care – a mixed methods study

Person‐centred care in primary care: What works for whom, how and in what circumstances?

Supported: Supporting, enabling, and sustaining homecare workers to deliver end-of-life care: A qualitative study protocol

Factors associated with health professionals' stress reactions, job satisfaction, intention to leave and health-related outcomes in acute care, rehabilitation and psychiatric hospitals, nursing homes and home care organisations

A longitudinal qualitative study of health care personnel's perceptions of simultaneous implementation of three risk assessment scales on falls, malnutrition and pressure ulcers

A collaborative endeavour to integrate leadership and person-centred ethics: a focus group study on experiences from developing and realising an educational programme to support the transition towards person-centred care