Abstract:Neural network pruning is a fruitful area of research with surging interest in high sparsity regimes. Benchmarking in this domain heavily relies on faithful representation of the sparsity of subnetworks, which has been traditionally computed as the fraction of removed connections (direct sparsity). This definition, however, fails to recognize unpruned parameters that detached from input or output layers of underlying subnetworks, potentially underestimating actual effective sparsity: the fraction of inactivated connections. While this effect might be negligible for moderately pruned networks (up to 10-100 compression rates), we find that it plays an increasing role for thinner subnetworks, greatly distorting comparison between different pruning algorithms. For example, we show that effective compression of a randomly pruned LeNet-300-100 can be orders of magnitude larger than its direct counterpart, while no discrepancy is ever observed when using SynFlow for pruning [Tanaka et al., 2020]. In this work, we adopt the lens of effective sparsity to reevaluate several recent pruning algorithms on common benchmark architectures (e.g., LeNet-300-100, VGG-19, ResNet-18) and discover that their absolute and relative performance changes dramatically in this new and more appropriate framework. To aim for effective, rather than direct, sparsity, we develop a low-cost extension to most pruning algorithms. Further, equipped with effective sparsity as a reference frame, we partially reconfirm that random pruning with appropriate sparsity allocation across layers performs as well or better than more sophisticated algorithms for pruning at initialization [Su et al., 2020]. In response to this observation, using a simple analogy of pressure distribution in coupled cylinders from physics, we design novel layerwise sparsity quotas that outperform all existing baselines in the context of random pruning.

Intragroup Sparsity for Efficient Inference

Joint Sparsity with Mixed Granularity for Efficient GPU Implementation

Balanced Sparsity for Efficient DNN Inference on GPU

Sparsity in Deep Learning: Pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networks

Exploring Fine-Grained Sparsity in Convolutional Neural Networks for Efficient Inference

An Image Enhancing Pattern-Based Sparsity for Real-Time Inference on Mobile Devices

OptG: Optimizing Gradient-driven Criteria in Network Sparsity

Exploring the Granularity of Sparsity in Convolutional Neural Networks.

Exploring the Regularity of Sparse Structure in Convolutional Neural Networks

Network Topology Inference with Sparsity and Laplacian Constraints

How Sparse Can We Prune A Deep Network: A Fundamental Limit Viewpoint

The Sparsity Roofline: Understanding the Hardware Limits of Sparse Neural Networks

Structured Sparsity With Group-Graph Regularization

Transfer Knowledge for High Sparsity in Deep Neural Networks

Efficient Neural Networks with Spatial Wise Sparsity Using Unified Importance Map.

Learning k-Level Structured Sparse Neural Networks Using Group Envelope Regularization

Selective Inference for Group-Sparse Linear Models

1$\Times$n Block Pattern for Network Sparsity

Connectivity Matters: Neural Network Pruning Through the Lens of Effective Sparsity

Effective Sparsification of Neural Networks with Global Sparsity Constraint

TETRIS: TilE-matching the TRemendous Irregular Sparsity