Abstract:Background: Depression is a mental health disorder characterized by affective, somatic, and cognitive symptoms. Attention bias modification (ABM) has been widely used to treat depression. However, the results seem inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of ABM for depression and to explore the optimal protocol of ABM. Methods: Seven databases were systematically searched from their inceptions to 5 October 2022 to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ABM for depression. Two independent reviewers selected the eligible articles, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB 2.0) for randomized trials. The primary outcome was the evaluation of depressive symptoms using widely accepted and validated scales. The secondary outcomes included rumination and attentional control. Meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan (version 5.4) and Stata (version 12.0). Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were performed to identify the source of heterogeneity. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: A total of 19 trials involving 20 datasets (1,262 participants) were included. The overall risk of bias in one study was rated as low risk of bias, three studies were considered as high, and the remaining studies were some concerns. Compared with attention control training (ACT), ABM had a greater effect in the improvement of depression (SMD = −0.48, 95% CI −0.80 to −0.17, I 2 = 82%) and rumination (MD = −3.46, 95% CI −6.06 to −0.87, I 2 = 0%). No significant differences were observed in the attentional control outcome between ABM and ACT (MD = 3.07, 95% CI −0.52 to 6.65, I 2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that adults exhibited a greater decrease in depression scores than adolescents. ABM using the dot-probe task, training target stimulus presented by face, and training directions by left–right were associated with better antidepressant effects. ABM training delivered in the laboratory tended to yield a better effect than those conducted at home. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were robust. The certainty of the evidence for all outcomes was low or very low, and publication bias may exist. Conclusion: Due to high heterogeneity and limited studies, not enough current evidence supported that ABM could be an effective intervention to relieve depressive symptoms. More rigorous RCTs are required to verify the benefits and to explore the optimal protocol of ABM training for depression. Systematic Review Registration: [PROSPERO], identifier [No. CRD42021279163].

The Efficacy of Measurement-Based Care for Depressive Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

The Efficacy of Measurement-Based Care for Depressive Disorders

Comparison of the Efficacy Between Standard Measurement-Base Care (MBC) and Enhanced MBC for Major Depressive Disorder: A Pilot Study

Implementing Measurement-Based Care for Depression: Practical Solutions for Psychiatrists and Primary Care Physicians.

Ndt_a_283731 79..90

An overview of which health domains to consider and when to apply them in measurement-based care for depression and anxiety disorders

The Effectiveness of Metacognitive Therapy Compared to Behavioral Activation for Severely Depressed Outpatients: A Single-Center Randomized Trial

EMBED Phase 2 Study Protocol V.1.4: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Enhanced Versus Standard Measurement-Based Care Implementation for Depression

Attention bias modification for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Shifting From Best Practice to Standard Practice: Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Health Systems

Efficacy of trial-based cognitive therapy, behavioral activation and treatment as usual in the treatment of major depressive disorder: preliminary findings from a randomized clinical trial

The Effect of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Major Depressive Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Non-convulsive Electric Shock in the Treatment of Depression: A Meta-analysis

Barriers and Facilitators to Technology-Enhanced Measurement Based Care for Depression among Canadian Clinicians and Patients: Results of an Online Survey

Cognitive restructuring, behavioral activation and cognitive-behavioral therapy in the treatment of adult depression: A network meta-analysis.

Comparative efficacy of pharmacological treatments on measures of self-rated functional outcomes using the Sheehan Disability Scale in patients with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Efficacy of web-based self-management interventions for depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for subthreshold depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Remote measurement based care (RMBC) interventions for mental health—Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis

Non-pharmacological treatment of depression: a systematic review and evidence map