Chronic Ethanol Exposure Enhances Facial Stimulation-Evoked Mossy Fiber–Granule Cell Synaptic Transmission Via GluN2A Receptors in the Mouse Cerebellar Cortex

Bing-Xue Li,Guang-Hui Dong,Hao-Long Li,Jia-Song Zhang,Yan-Hua Bing,Chun-Ping Chu,Song-Biao Cui,De-Lai Qiu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.657884
2021-01-01
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Abstract:Sensory information is transferred to the cerebellar cortex via the mossy fiber–granule cell (MF–GC) pathway, which participates in motor coordination and motor learning. We previously reported that chronic ethanol exposure from adolescence facilitated the sensory-evoked molecular layer interneuron–Purkinje cell synaptic transmission in adult mice in vivo. Herein, we investigated the effect of chronic ethanol exposure from adolescence on facial stimulation-evoked MF–GC synaptic transmission in the adult mouse cerebellar cortex using electrophysiological recording techniques and pharmacological methods. Chronic ethanol exposure from adolescence induced an enhancement of facial stimulation-evoked MF–GC synaptic transmission in the cerebellar cortex of adult mice. The application of an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist, D-APV (250 μM), induced stronger depression of facial stimulation-evoked MF–GC synaptic transmission in chronic ethanol-exposed mice compared with that in control mice. Chronic ethanol exposure-induced facilitation of facial stimulation evoked by MF–GC synaptic transmission was abolished by a selective GluN2A antagonist, PEAQX (10 μM), but was unaffected by the application of a selective GluN2B antagonist, TCN-237 (10 μM), or a type 1 metabotropic glutamate receptor blocker, JNJ16259685 (10 μM). These results indicate that chronic ethanol exposure from adolescence enhances facial stimulation-evoked MF–GC synaptic transmission via GluN2A, which suggests that chronic ethanol exposure from adolescence impairs the high-fidelity transmission capability of sensory information in the cerebellar cortex by enhancing the NMDAR-mediated components of MF–GC synaptic transmission in adult mice in vivo.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?